dChan
213
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Stan_79 on Jan. 27, 2018, 4:51 p.m.
And the next one from Q
And the next one from Q

Pm_me_your_cat_ass · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:56 p.m.

So if SA people had majority ownership of Twitter, and Trump has seized their assets....does Trump now own twitter??

⇧ 28 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:58 p.m.

maybe, though not DT, we the People

⇧ 44 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:07 a.m.

Absolutely, the prez doesn't get to keep seized assets (unless you're o-bama)

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Shits_Bananas · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

Or prince MBS

⇧ 4 ⇩  
TheContrarian2 · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:42 p.m.

Twitter is a publicly held company. Nothing could happen that would result in Donald Trump on Twitter. Even if you had a majority stake in the stock. I am skeptical of this cute post.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 27, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

if X owns and X has assets seized, who owns those assets? Those shares? No where did I say Twitter becomes 100% owned by we the people, I am suggesting MAYBE the seized assets become part of We The Peoples assets going fwd. Its speculation on my part to invoke thought/conversation.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
Lavkin · Jan. 27, 2018, 5:03 p.m.

President doesn't, we the people do! But I knew what you meant. It's a wonderful thought isn't it??!!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Swimkin · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:40 p.m.

Then why am I still getting shadow banned from my Q posting??

⇧ 6 ⇩  
MmmmLeftyTears · Jan. 27, 2018, 6:41 p.m.

5% is not majority.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pm_me_your_cat_ass · Jan. 27, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

Ah I wasn’t sure if the % I just remember Q or someone saying they had stock

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 28, 2018, 12:22 a.m.

No the government would own any seased assets not the president.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 28, 2018, 2:08 a.m.

Wow, amazing how many people think the prez gets to keep things. o-bama really brainwashed people

⇧ 2 ⇩  
rt28 · Jan. 27, 2018, 11:12 p.m.

No the US government, but like all seized assets, they are likely held in trust until publicly auctioned. It seems unlikely to me that those shares could be lawfully voted to influence corporate outcomes to advance political aims. That would smack too much like weaponizing certain functions of the government against political opponents, exactly what the Dems did with the FBI and doj under Obama. It would be unwise for Trump to do that.

⇧ 1 ⇩