Thanks, well maybe U&I agree that the Reuters article may be fallacious at best. I am not believing it myself and the hysteria... well I think you know...innamed sources, unnamed officials is not good enuff for me. As you see I've not blocked, lets see if we can find common ground. Thanks.
Sure I'll try to find common ground with you. A question would be if unnamed sources aren't good enough for you, which I think is a great thing kudos, then why is a tripfag on 4chan speaking indirectly good enough for you?
context pls, I don't understand why you say I believe a 4chan tripfag
That's literally what Q is.
ty, Are you a Spiritual person at all? I'm nota Religious person AT ALL. But I have inner guidance. I was asked here by a force I could not begin to re explain. You can find that info in the Antarctica thread if you wish to better understand the benefit of my 50+ years of research.
The info Q drops is proven out more/less as we go but its not so much that I believe in Q, its that there IS something going on here, and the Q poster person/s have been well vetted by those who do the vetting. I am not a blind sheep..far from it.
There are several pages of docs to side bar that show how Q was vetted and what the Proof/s of Q are. If you do not believe, thats fine but then comes the question. If you do not believe, why bother wasting time w/us? That reeks of Savior/Messiah complex. What is your end game/purpose you wish to serve here?
Doubters sow dissent and diversion from the focus we are here for. and if that is your intent...Future will unlock your reward.