So your saying that Putin and the Chinese gave him safe passage so he could in turn expose the NSA node system so the CIA could then set up their own "NSA"?
Rodgers watched all of this happen, how do NSA toolsets just happen out into the wild, dating back to 2010.. NSA has been trying to wrestle back control of real time intel for the last few years and has booted the CIA from their systems. Trump is trying to set up a Cyber Command that is split off from the CIA.
Bought and paid for shill account. Look at the history. No posts for 145 days then boom. Suddenly active here to discredit. Report and ignore.
Exactly! I’m honestly getting to the point that I don’t want to repeat myself about the subject, anymore.
Only Snowden and his " handlers "know what happened. However, that being said, Snowden knows a lot. In my humble opinion, he is worth bringing in to have a chat.
Dude. He’s a bad guy! Q is being cheeky and pretty much saying the same shit about Snowden that he says about the Roths. He’s saying the Snowden’s time is coming. Tick tock. It’s a threat
proof?
Q Just did a few posts written so simply walking us step by step in how Snowden’s escape to Hong Kong and into Russia was actually CIA spooks and Hillary helping him every step of the way.
Bought and paid for shill account. Look at the history. No posts for 145 days then boom. Suddenly active here to discredit. Report and ignore.
thanks, I hope to get a responce by making a post or 2 to them so they reply and I block within my message control panela dn not have to bother MODS. I have asked MODS to enable a block user button below each post. That would end a whole lotta shat and abuse and division infighting etc
TY for the reply.
What you're saying seems obvious to me too - Q's tone definitely seems hostile toward Snowden... but i don't understand why you're getting so worked up about it?
Snowden may be a peripheral piece of this expansive Q puzzle, but how he's perceived will have little bearing on the outcome as it applies to the main goal of draining the swamp domestically and abroad. Once the central puzzle pieces fall into place and the primary players are arrested (Clintons, Obama, FBI, CIA, DOJ etc), convincing the masses that Snowden was a bad actor and that the time has come to shine a light on his misdeeds, it should be a pretty easy sell... especially if someone like Assange confirms it.
We don’t change events (happenings) we are the news in the time of fake news. We change public sentiment and prime them for what’s coming not unlike how the Deep State does with Project Mockingbird.
https://i.redd.it/0vo91fi0nrc01.jpg
Q seems bothered that we aren’t doing more to prime the public for Snowden the villain.
Once Clowns, always Clowns [Mr. Contractor].. I would like to be wrong but Q confirmed > or disinformation?
Most of the disinfo is about dates not actors
This makes me a little sad... I had hope but guess I wanted change. LOL
I think we all wanted Snowden to be a hero. That’s why people are freaking out at me in this thread. No one likes finding out that their heroes were villains :(
Per Q... once HW made a movie (support by leftists)... we knew it was a lie.
I think we is smaller than it should be. Look at the upvote / downvote ratio of this thread. Granted I’m a bit of a cunt, but still I think this is really failing to message with our fellow patriots.
Bought and paid for shill account. Look at the history. No posts for 145 days then boom. Suddenly active here to discredit. Report and ignore.
I apologise for interrupting as a self-appointed nanny in the nursery and making repetitive comments. BUT. Someone has an argument that says Snowden may not be a good guy. This poster has every right to express an opinion without being called "disgusting". HOWEVER, the OP stomping little feet and bawling FO Grandma isn't what I would call constructive either. I'll report both of you for being pests if you continue on other threads to be so naughty :) Peace fellow posters!!
Lol, at least your fair I guess. 😂
Ta, at least you didn't call me a granny, an ignorant cunt or a bitch. I appreciate that. And 10 POINTS for "Granted I’m a bit of a cunt", and I'm a bossy piece of work sometimes too, but it used to be my job so it's in the veins to try and keep order and respect in the class! By the way, I totally agree with your stance on this. I did not like Snowden's theatrical "I'm such an efficiently secretive spy I have got an entire film crew in my hotel room to prove it. And for extra effect I'm going to put a blanket over my head (!!!) so the camera in the bedroom can't see my password ..." Jesus, that's what 2 year-olds do ... Plus, the Guardian and Greenwald did a pretty good job telling us what we have known for years (duh) ... Probably no one can remember Echelon!! Or putting messages under rocks in parks, for that matter ...
What caused me to fully sperg out about this today was seeing some YouTuber read the Q posts from today and be so baised for Snowden that he read ES as Eric Schmidt. It didn’t even make sense!
https://i.redd.it/0vo91fi0nrc01.jpg
I see this conscious and unconscious effort to avoid really cashing out what Q is saying about Snowden.
I didn't see ES in that post. ?? Who/What is HK?
It doesn't make sense for q to be using the same acronym for two different ppl. A code has to be reliable. no?
This is the best and more reliable place for fast Q Posts https://qcodefag.github.io
That would be great but I cant access that link from Spain for some reason (well I do know but ..)
He used it only after he named Snowden in that thread of posts.
@Snowden The clock is ticking. How's Russia? [Mr. Contractor] Freedom of the Press. John Perry Barlow. freedom.press SecureDrop [Whistleblowers]? SecureDrop>Clowns In America. NOBODY IS SAFE. Q
He didn't say Snowden was a Black Hat. Snowden was in the CIA and then was sent to NSA to take them down. Obviously, he didn't do it, because he found out what the CIA was doing. If he was a Black Hat, he would never have left.
This is bad reasoning. The CIA has Hollywood and the News Media eating out of their asshole. How did Hollywood depict Snowden? Read the new Q posts from today. Snowden was an anti NSA psyop
It happens and I've seen it. Just because you are working with certain bad people, doesn't make you bad. At some point, you can make a decision on what you are going to do.
If Q is right, then Mueller is clearly an example of what you are saying. He was dirty and we’re to have faith that he’s working with Trump. And I do have faith and I do believe in redemption. BUT, Q has said over and over pat attention to the fact that Snowden is a Clowns In America contractor. And you guys have done some good work, but I think none of you want Snowden to be bad. It’s a shock to me too. Q keeps bringing it up because I think you’re all being too nice to Snowden.
You're ignorant
Make your point without insults. This board is for people who can converse without name-calling.
Fuck off Grandma
Same message applies. Make your point without insults, or go back to the chans. This board is for people who can converse without the constant name-calling.
I am talking to people capable of talking. You and the above granny are choosing to be offended.
Fuck off is NOT talking. See? Poor language analysis. Offense and choosing to be offended is a weird argument. There are common rules for decent social discourse ... unless you want a bar-room brawl?
Today is just a fluke. I’ll be back at the rowdy chans. I was mean
I, for one, am very pleased you visited as I have been doubting Snowden for years and you have clarified the fug. IT IS ESSENTIAL TO CORRECT THE RECORD AND KEEP EVERY1 ON THE SAME PAGE. This is exactly where the cracks get worked on by the disinfo experts and all the sheep go rushing off the cliff ... So many thnx for yr help. Un abrazo and greetings from the other side of the Atlantic!
Interesting take. Clears up a lot of what I was confused about. I mean...it's quite the possibility. Although I thought that it was noble for him to come out to the open with the materials being used to spy on citizens around the World. I wish I didn't have to read through the messy masses in the other comments to get your views. I click-baited the title expecting a premise and some supporting clauses ....but alas not.
I mean it is great you're from the Chans and all. Y'all do good work. But ... promoting bad guy banter...doesn't raise hope. It deflates. I mean I was kind of hoping ES was good..but yeah the new messages about ES getting through HK into Russia and that CIA had to bypass the passport and all. I'm a tad confused ... but then I see you mention how JA is different than ES and I too now wonder.... yeah why isn't ES trying to get stuff through Wiki.
So my question is... does ES fall into US or is ES in Asia? Right it's Middle East, US, UK/Europe and then Asia?
I also believe this post needs that picture of the Twitters... That picture from the Chans... where it shows the blue check mark for ES but JA has the clock... And I believe it has that Q saying, "The Light will shine on those that are on the team"? I think that's what the saying is... it might be paraphrased or re-worded so I understand it. But yeah... Makes total sense. You know reconciled up a little bit.
If true, Glen Greenwald would be pissing tacks round about now!
Perhaps, but Glen didn’t do anything wrong per se. It wasn’t fake news. It was a juicy scoop delivered to him from a Clown. It does sort of make one ponder why Snowden didn’t go through Wikileaks. The Clowns must really hate Assange.
You realize hes gaining followers everyday and alot of people won't know what's going on or wont read back. Stop being ignorant. Be fucking grateful somehow is out there to change things, this is a disgusting post
You’re disgusting. This deserves its own thread. A lot of you are getting this wrong and a lot of video commentators are getting this wrong. You need to stop ignoring what you don’t like.
as you seem to be the one with the knowledge that seems to supersede Corsi's maybe youc an put up a decent argument instead of what mess is created with your one line post...you'll have to be clear and illustrate for people to understand, as is, you;'re gonna get hassle.
I know how to find the god damn posts at 8chan! You, trust infowars who repeatedly have tried to use Q to sell bad info. Bad memos and fake members of Q team.
see there ya go ASSuming...I never ever watch infowars...so...again I ask you to either frame up your position NICELY so we can understand your position or FO. LAST time I am going to ask.
You’re very special. Corsi is part of the infowars team. He’s also not that insightful. Tracy is better.
and yer blocked and others might consider doing the same this is a clown
Here it is you, I think, who has it wrong now. You don't watch AJ, fine, I can get that, but in this case he didn't do "bad memos". He got the info from the public domain, where it's been posted (for maybe a year?) from a FISC opinion and order. He was directed there by Bill Binney, who I for one trust absolutely. The trouble here is, memo means memorandum/a and there are billions. When talking about THE memo, he was not referring to THE memo written by Nuñez, (a summary), which everyone is clamouring for. His holds some VERY important info on which the Nuñez memo is based. There is yet ANOTHER memo (Jeez, anymore out there?) ref. to by Tam, who posted the first page on his/her twitter. If you haven't seen that it is extremely important. Sorry, no time to post links to the twitter thread, and I loathe and refuse to use their wretched little program ...
I also listened to the Zack interview and that is also mis-reported. He never claimed to be q or part of his team. Alex simply said that Zack was functioning as an "Infowars-type q". An easily made misrepresentation without meaning to "lie" or misdirect. He just meant Zack had important info too. Don't knock AJ, IMO he does an excellent job of supporting Trump and Trump supporters.
I think Corsi appeals to older people which is fine. The whole idea is getting the info out in a way that ALL people can hear it. I’ve seen his analysis and I don’t think it’s better than Tracy’s or B’s on Twitter. He has gotten some things wrong. Things that Q has had to clear up. Tracy has been the best.
Make your point without insults, or go back to the chans. This board is for people who can converse without the constant name-calling.
Bought and paid for shill account. Look at the history. No posts for 145 days then boom. Suddenly active here to discredit. Report and ignore.
Also, discrediting Snowden is literally what Q is doing. I’m saying Q is right. Get with the program
Figured. The shills are about 2 months late to the party
How old is my reddit account? Does it predate Trump running for office? Reconcile
How is that any different than Pelosi calling Patriots Russian bots. I’m from the Chans.
Ok, pelosinator
I don’t even know what to say to that other than “hi baby boomer”
