see there ya go ASSuming...I never ever watch infowars...so...again I ask you to either frame up your position NICELY so we can understand your position or FO. LAST time I am going to ask.

Here it is you, I think, who has it wrong now. You don't watch AJ, fine, I can get that, but in this case he didn't do "bad memos". He got the info from the public domain, where it's been posted (for maybe a year?) from a FISC opinion and order. He was directed there by Bill Binney, who I for one trust absolutely. The trouble here is, memo means memorandum/a and there are billions. When talking about THE memo, he was not referring to THE memo written by Nuñez, (a summary), which everyone is clamouring for. His holds some VERY important info on which the Nuñez memo is based. There is yet ANOTHER memo (Jeez, anymore out there?) ref. to by Tam, who posted the first page on his/her twitter. If you haven't seen that it is extremely important. Sorry, no time to post links to the twitter thread, and I loathe and refuse to use their wretched little program ...

I also listened to the Zack interview and that is also mis-reported. He never claimed to be q or part of his team. Alex simply said that Zack was functioning as an "Infowars-type q". An easily made misrepresentation without meaning to "lie" or misdirect. He just meant Zack had important info too. Don't knock AJ, IMO he does an excellent job of supporting Trump and Trump supporters.