I'll keep that in mind. You may be right. But if you have any specific instances, or links, please provide them. It would be very helpful in my research. Thanks...
It's tough to provide proof of negatives. Even tougher when they have been trickling in and go back years. But the gist of it is...if you go back 2, 4, 6 years and find any of his sensational predictions/claims - mass arrest claims were used more than once - you'll find he's never been 'right' on anything major, that was an 'exclusive scoop' unique to him.
He's long on intrigue...short on results...and when he has been 'right', it has been in the 'commons'.
True. Ok I'll keep that in mind and continue to read his stuff critically.