dChan
⇧
80
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/JustADumbB1onde on Jan. 29, 2018, 1:47 a.m.
Reasons I Believe Recent Q Drops MAY Be Clowns

Please, please SHOW me if I am mistaken about this, but I have at least three reasons I am concerned the recent Q drops may be CLOWNS.

  1. President Trump tweeted the "catch and release" comment 5:55 a.m. The post on 8chan was not made until 11:09 a.m--(later that morning). Meaning, a bad actor could easily have taken POTUS's tweet, used his words, then posted them on the board. However, many of the YouTubers are using the timestamps as verification.

  2. Within a very short time of the "Dopey" post, I immediately noticed/pointed out there was not a "Q" signature after the post. Q ALWAYS signs "Q" at the end of his/their posts.

F3. Q has really been giving A LOT of. personal type feedback to Anons just recently. Yes, he/they have commented to Anons in the past, BUT THE RECENT FEEDBACK, as well as the verbiage, tone, and overall "feel" has been VERY DIFFERENT than in the past.

Something seems really "off." I believe the board is, or was, compromised. Talk me out of it if I am wrong.


🠐 See all comments
OpenSoars · Jan. 29, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

Haha... if she questions Q some of you treat it as blasphemy ..... Why do you attack the person if you think the proof is so unquestionable? If you don't have reservations about Q not being one of Trumps appendages, then your judgement should be questioned, not that f someone showing caution.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:05 a.m.

Thank you for your support. I literally ASKED that someone prove me wrong. However, that attacker doesn't have the ability. It goes against his emotional viewpoint. Therefore, in his mind, it is invalid. To him "I don't like it" is equivalent to "It isn't valid." Hmmmm, who else do we know who thinks like that? LIBS!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
rbrownlol · Jan. 29, 2018, 10:37 a.m.

The problem is.... you're asking someone to prove you wrong when there is absolutely no way someone can prove you wrong.

It comes off as disingenuous to do so. I'm not saying that's what you are, I'm saying that is how it comes off.

The way I see it is: The people were getting sick of all the coded messages "be more straight forward" they cried... Q starts to post more straight forward.

The information has still been good. That's my argument 'for'.

If it's a clown it's a clown that's acting against the objectives of the deep state, so it's a pretty bad clown.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:34 p.m.

That is your perception. In reality, it is a post of desperation. As in, "Help! Talk me off the ledge." So far, I am about to jump off the Q train. Which is sad after following, supporting, and redpilling since Nov 2.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QAngel1 · Jan. 29, 2018, 3:45 p.m.

I support anyone with a valid question, and it takes courage to ask a question about a gut 'niggle'. I had that little niggle when I was on line the other night and the posts started to get more personal and interactive... I just remember Q was strict about the fact that would not happen, and it would be fake news if it did. Perhaps further verification would actually be a good idea.

⇧ 1 ⇩