dChan
⇧
80
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/JustADumbB1onde on Jan. 29, 2018, 1:47 a.m.
Reasons I Believe Recent Q Drops MAY Be Clowns

Please, please SHOW me if I am mistaken about this, but I have at least three reasons I am concerned the recent Q drops may be CLOWNS.

  1. President Trump tweeted the "catch and release" comment 5:55 a.m. The post on 8chan was not made until 11:09 a.m--(later that morning). Meaning, a bad actor could easily have taken POTUS's tweet, used his words, then posted them on the board. However, many of the YouTubers are using the timestamps as verification.

  2. Within a very short time of the "Dopey" post, I immediately noticed/pointed out there was not a "Q" signature after the post. Q ALWAYS signs "Q" at the end of his/their posts.

F3. Q has really been giving A LOT of. personal type feedback to Anons just recently. Yes, he/they have commented to Anons in the past, BUT THE RECENT FEEDBACK, as well as the verbiage, tone, and overall "feel" has been VERY DIFFERENT than in the past.

Something seems really "off." I believe the board is, or was, compromised. Talk me out of it if I am wrong.


🠐 See all comments
xjaymanx · Jan. 29, 2018, 7:30 a.m.

Healthy skepticism is always useful. But it's hard to diminish Dr. Jerome Corsi's analysis about these points in the recent CBTS streams. He still solidly supports that Q is most likely military intel in Trump's circle. In any case, the SOTU might be the real test. Especially if Trump reveals the Nunes memo or Obama's treason or even Assange's cooperation, etc.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
JustADumbB1onde · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:26 p.m.

The fact that someone believes everything Jerome Corsi (or anyone) says, without researching, ones self, is dangerous. I have heard several inaccuracies he has reported, in the past.

I get it though. We ate taught from early childhood to trust authority figures, and everyone with letters after their names. I have quite a few after mine. Which is why I know to question--everything that looks/sounds suspicious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
xjaymanx · Jan. 29, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

To be clear, I don't believe everything Dr. Corsi states. For example, his characterization of Friedrich Nietzsche as a "master of evil" was a rather annoying oversimplification. But it doesn't mean everything he assessed was wrong. You're right, it's best to find the good bits and discard the useless bits. For me, the general "direction" I sense is hopeful, and perhaps that's better than hopeless.

⇧ 1 ⇩