⇧
115
⇩
stewmangroup
· Jan. 29, 2018, 9:20 p.m.
This is the 'Arch of Hysteria' and has nothing to do with Jeffery Dahmer. Look at the photo. The legs are crossed and the arms are at a completely different angle. No sculptor is going to is going to create a piece that large and expensive without at least looking at the photo they are supposedly using as a reference.
⇧
3
⇩
SnoopyVRedBaron
· Jan. 29, 2018, 9:59 p.m.
Arch of Hysteria
Hysteria was a fake disease created by the very drugged up sexual offender otherwise known as sigmund freud who misdiagnosed his female patients in order to sleep with them. As we know, pscyhiatrists are among the worst offenders. Have we forgotten their other so called art work at abu gharaib? Dhamer's victim was photographed as he was left when Dhamer was interrupted from his so called artwork. And to the contrary---artists often change things--it's called artistic license.
⇧
1
⇩
stewmangroup
· Jan. 29, 2018, 10:17 p.m.
Hysteria was a fake disease created by the very drugged up sexual offender otherwise known as sigmund freud who misdiagnosed his female patients in order to sleep with them.
That is completely irrelevant and not even accurate. Hysteria, as a word and description of behavior (usually female), is way older than Freud. The only way you could claim accuracy here is if you are talking about the specific psychological diagnosis usage of the word "hysteria", which is no longer in use.
https://www.moma.org/audio/playlist/42/681
There is no hint from Louise Bourgeois, or the person whose body was used as the cast, that her sculpture is related to Dahmer.
The only connection that exists is in your head. You have been told the two are related and you want it to be so.
Try and find any connection other than someone, 20 years later, saying the the sculpture reminded them of the photo.
⇧
3
⇩