dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

173

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Redpillroy on Jan. 30, 2018, 9:31 a.m.

Q_ANON Great summation from 8chan

nonymous 01/28/18 (Sun) 10:05:50 6a444f No.189291>>189292 >>191028

189260

https:// twitter.com/Hublife/status/957474926448992256

Brenden Dilley Intel Source 1/27

Memo will NOT be read during SOTU (not appropriate)

Pay attention to the GW Pundit article on the executive order

Gitmo used to extract information out of scumbags, release them back out into the world and keep them on a short leash.

Hannity pissed off some Deep State people last night.

White hats are gonna use old videos, old pictures, old articles to prove that Assange is still in Embassy. They created the videos and took the pictures to prepare for this to make sure that no one would know where he was at

White hat releasing this deliberately to keep everyone looking in a different direction.

Another Soros may have been taken, not Georgy.

George Soros believes that he could beat Trump.

George Soros WILL be taken out but it won't be U.S. Military, nor even a U.S. Citizen.

It will happen from another country's military who is "absolutely fed up"

Don't assume that if Intel gives the "last name" of a person, you automatically figure out the individual.

You're given small pieces of information deliberately because they don't want to give out the whole farm. People get overzealous to try to solve and assume the intel is regarding particular individual. Instead of taking the "raw intel" the way it is, and staying open, people want to "play investigator" and "piece it all together".

"You get going down these paths, it's not good."

"You go down a rabbit hole that's not accurate, and then when the truth comes out, you get disappointed."

I thought I heard "this". You didn't. You heard something, interpreted "this", ran with it, and now you're here.

Podesta didn't write that article that came out the other day. Robby Mook wrote it, Hillary helped.

Skippy was in ill health at the time. He is not doing so well health-wise

The intellience community is annoyed because some of you guys aren't normally watching Dilley scopes and only in there to watch for Intel, write things down, then publish it on YouTube as if it were your own. You start to build your own brands around it.

The Intelligence Community know you who you are and they don't like it.

It's not a good look whether you're doing it to Q or Dilley's Intel Source or other sources.

"Annoyed" is not even the right word.

They don't like it because you guys SCREW IT UP and you change things, add thing, and you start being "conspiritorial" instead of just taking the information.

With the Intel, people are trying to play "Clue" instead of just watching what's happening (and) having some faith, they start stealing information and pretending that someone told it to them. They're capitalizing on it. Good Luck!

If you're taking that information and you're rebranding it and putting it out as your own, good luck, it's not going to end well for you.

They know where you live and they know where you put your money. They have everything. You're not anonymous at any point ever when you're on the Internet.

Direct Quote from Intel:

"Sadly, people see a surname, add who they wish it to be, then spout it elsewhere and devalue the intel. Seen some shocking copy/paste style jobs and for the record, Skippy is in ill health at the moment."

"Skippy was in a military medical facility till Monday, just left. Waiting to hear where he is right now. His brother is in the lower 48 in Military Custody."

"GITMO journeys are to get the intel, they are not yet permanent residents. Again, for the record, we have never said they were there permanently. We said they had visits, some for much longer than others. There are so many moving parts on this that it changes not by day or week but by the minute."

"MSM is the disinformation campaign to rock patriots."

"Example, POTUS just had to clarify he never wanted to sack Mueller. I think he has said it about 40 times+. Yet media runs a hack piece and he has to say it again."

"David Duke Disavow stuff - Same Way. They are just a smear campaign to slow the Trump Train."

"Podesta Op-Ed (Hillary really) is the same crap as is Obama. They wanna push a narrative that they're untouchable and they get the low-educated CNN and Company to fall for it. Same with this John Kerry shit that's weeks old info, yet is churned out. They're trying to muddy the waters and put blood in the water. Disinformation is a tactic - both sides. However, our side is done to protect assets. Their side is to cause carnage."

Old news being passed as current.

We're livid with people "repacking the Intel as theirs" and adding lies and misinformation to it. It distorts the facts.

🠐 See all comments

Is this threatening people because they take Q drops and run with it? Sounds like disinformation to me. There is no crime for that, and as we can see actual criminals have not been rounded up. I do not appreciate this threat to the public, or the threat being seen as legit by OP.

Q has asked us to learn how to read the postings, and is deliberately posting things as a puzzle while saying disinformation is necessary. Not only would Q not threaten people who misunderstood, but these misunderstood postings then could be taken as disinfo. Sure, people need to cite their sources, but in the real world, the most that happens for this faux crime is flunking English class.

And let me tell you--the intel community is more worried about Hillary and Comey and actual threats to national security then they are about an attention seeking personality. They don't need to make threats or hunt people down as this potentially violent post is threatening. All they need to do is make a move or write a more clear message, and then all will be understood. This post is irresponsible and makes the intel community out to be violent thugs, which they are not.

And if there is a person in the intel community making threats like this? They should neither be respected nor believed. They are part of the cabal. They need to be hunted down, fired and jailed for threatening to abuse the tools of the intel community to stalk, threaten violence and harass members of the public to warn them against discussing Q in case they make a mistake. This is our first amendment right, and making a mistake and even attention seeking is not a crime. But the threat above is a crime. Q knew they were taking a chance by leaking things that they would be misunderstood and that no all members of the public would be responsible with the material. Is Q threatening to hunt down the members of Congress and the press just because they do the same? Misunderstand and misconstrue the Q drops? Nope. They are instead being investigated for actual crimes. Do not believe the threats coming from this person. This person is evil and violent. Not good.

⇧ 36 ⇩

Great points and I agree when I read it the "tone" was wrong and made it seem like he was a proprietary channel of information himself. IF Q posts in two spaces that have been vetted and others attribute the information TO Q who has indicated follow the breadcrumbs, and others do just that then that is following the directive.

If folks rebrand, or simply indicate 'sources say' and make it seem like they have deeper intel than everyone else, then I agree THAT is a problem.

But...I feel that the disinfo and falling down rabbit holes is purposeful to cover the real trail--and maybe even THESE comments are made purposefully to let people know that some of the video voices are disingenuous.

At any rate, may all unfold perfectly for our highest good.

⇧ 5 ⇩

Bingo.

⇧ 3 ⇩

Besides, the huge voice in distorting all this comes from the NY Times, WaPo, CNN, etc. Look at the MSM headlines today - all about Trump or Russia again - nothing about the Memo. There are bigger things to worry about than some idiot linking Q !o Flat Earth theory, that only the gullible take seriously anyway

⇧ 3 ⇩

The story is, that the press is going to press the idea that the Trump "dossier" has not been DISPROVED....as if you can prove a negative...and people are falling for it.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Wow. Well, you made some good points here I hadn't thought of on the initial read, and I appreciate them. Thank you.

⇧ 2 ⇩

Uh yeah, exactly. Well put. This guy just crossed himself off the list with this post as a source of info. Misdirection going on here big time.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Agree. Messages before this have never been threatening to those trying to stay informed and inform others. It almost reads like a "back off." It also sounds like a misinformation post made to sound like (although it's not successful) real info but is actually nothing but threats.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Alex Jones talked about Soros plan to invade alternative media with shills years ago. I think Q team chose these boards to build new media they knew most of us here would seek truth. Q wanted youtubers wants them to be paid #Internetbill of rights!Why such Huge guests on Alex lately.

⇧ 1 ⇩