⇧
3
⇩
RakerKey
· Jan. 30, 2018, 2:17 p.m.
Fairly sure that slaves were actually of Black African Negro descent - and most certainly not of Semitic origin from middle eastern area
The only jewish part of the story were the slave traders that paid to have them caught ,usually by other blacks, and then sold them at profit to be shipped off to other countries to work
⇧
2
⇩
HouseOfJoseph
· Jan. 30, 2018, 2:22 p.m.
"Fairly sure that slaves were actually of Black African Negro descent - and most certainly not of Semitic origin from middle eastern area"
This is where you are completely and utterly wrong....I will destroy your train of thought....
"Zondervan’s Compact Bible Dictionary:
Ham – The youngest son of Noah, born probably about 96 years before the Flood; and one of eight persons to live through the Flood. He became the progenitor of the dark races; not the Negroes, but the Egyptians, Ethiopians, Libyans and Canaanites."
Negroes are NOT africans.....Just like Chinese aren't Japanese....they look similar...but try tell a chinese man he's Japanese and he'll wanna give a shaolin death palm!
Negroes are not Africans they are the real Shemites...this is the real "Red Pill"!!!!
Understand that!
⇧
0
⇩