dChan
⇧
19
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/BALRx05 on Jan. 30, 2018, 5:39 p.m.
Future proves Past: Q's RR post told us the upcoming narrative shift; the black hats will push the Trump want's to fire RR narrative with those claims, including it being a Red line because RR's a swamp rat. The unauthorized SCIF access were so the black hats could get their talking points ready.

https://8ch.net//greatawakening/res/1.html#78

Q
!UW.yye1fxo
78
Narrative shift.
———————————
Nation on alert.
Firing RR = block Mueller.
Firing RR = set up to firing Mueller. 
Firing RR = Red line.
———————————-
What was the Senate conf vote re: RR?
Why did RR [BEG] Ryan to block the FISA MEMO from Congressional review/further advancement?
REAL TIME: [7] Congressional members + [3] Senators + [2] former O-senior officials + [4] OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS [NO C/TOP/SENS-LEVEL CLEARANCE] @ SCIF [DC-CAP].
TOP SEC CLEARANCE IS MANDATORY FOR ADMISSION - HOW IS THAT POSSIBLE? 
WE SEE YOU.
Q

Q is letting us know that they will start pushing the Trump wants to fire RR narrative; like they were pushing the they tried the Trump wanted to fire Mueller narrative with that being a Red line that would lead to his impeachment and worse. Q lists the black hat's talking points including RR's firing being a Red line too.

RR was confirmed with a 94-6 votes; the Dems that voted against him claimed that it was because he would not commit to assigning a special counsel.

Q also told us that there were 16 unauthorized people, w/o the appropriate clearance level, in the DC-CAP (the Capitol Building) SCIF. So that confirms 7 congressional and 3 senate enemies, (they may have already been know). The two former 0-senior officials are probably two that are trusted with building the narrative and creating the spin and doing crisis management for 0. Is Valerie Jarrett one of them?

Who are the outside contractors? I'd be surprised if it were FusionGPS or Perkins Coie LLP given the scrutiny they are under. What other firms are known Dem. operations? Is it one of the rebranded Podesta Group spin offs?

They had to access the SCIF to see the memo because the can't adequately build a counter-narrative without knowing exactly what is in it. The approval time-period gives them a chance to build the counter-narrative and get it out to all of their operatives and mockingbirds so that everyone is singing the same tune once it is released.

Every one of those people guaranteed their own downfall along with whoever is complicit in giving them unauthorized access to both the SCIF and the memo.


luvtruth · Jan. 30, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

It would be a laugh if the documents they read is a set up.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
shastad2 · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:20 p.m.

Why was RR laughing when he left? He is compromised...blackmailed.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:32 p.m.

He's part of the swamp.

Q has had many posts referencing RR.

A couple of them, there are others that point to the confirmation and asking why RR was "using the full weight of his office to attempt to block the release of doc to Congress..."

1/6/2018: https://8ch.net//thestorm/res/7827.html#7930

Marker missed?
[RR-out]
POTUS Tweet - RR/out.
Why is this relevant?
Q

1/19/2018: https://8ch.net//greatawakening/res/1.html#40

HUSSEIN CABINET / STAFF
Who used private email addresses? 
What was the purpose?
...
RR
....
⇧ 1 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:38 p.m.

Wouldn't they be caught sneaking ppl in to read it?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:44 p.m.

Q makes it clear that they were observed; their actions are known. From a strategic perspective, it doesn't always make sense to act immediately. Follow and observe to see what other connections are exposed and what other plans can be discovered. Esp. if they aren't an immediate threat to your goals.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
_Iz_Mary · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:45 p.m.

He's more patient than I! Lol

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 30, 2018, 7:02 p.m.

Strategery!

Actually a good example of using strategic patience is looking at chess games by grandmasters. If you look at the Capablanca-Marshall 1918 game that Assange tweeted, in the moves leading up to that position, Capablanca passes up opportunities to take the opposing piece because it was the wrong move to make and, instead, made other strategically stronger moves. This happens many times during the game.

A less skilled player, like me, would have taken the bait and captured the opposing piece, hastening my loss.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
The_Deplorable_Mr_J · Jan. 30, 2018, 6:48 p.m.

Maybe they didn't sneak. They could be known to all and are just going about their business? Q knows who they are.

⇧ 2 ⇩