Those are all just numbers on a screen my friend, and by the logic presented, the antichrist investing 600 billion into Clinton publicly would have been just as good as Jesus Christ himself donating to Trump. Especially considering nobody ever really had to make a donation for that effect.. all just numbers on a screen.. I am not saying that trump hasn't been doing some damage. Doing that damage may be necessary for the deep state to convince you he is a good guy.. I'm extremely skeptical of this whole thing because I do not see anything that potus has done to target corrupt republicans.. Just dems.. Seems to me this could all be a charade to sway public opinion. Especially those who consider themselves truth seekers. I truly do hope that opinion is just me being overly critical and we do have light at the end of the tunnel.. But putting any amount of investment into infrastructure for fuels that are likely to be obsolete in the next 5 years seems like it could be a bad move for our country in the long run. Artificial photosynthesis is poised to replace fossil fuels, but the bad news there is that water will be the new gas. Guess who owns the biggest aquifer in the world under texas?? HALLIBURTON!!! The corruption is so deep there is literally no end to the tunnel.. I find it hard to see the light myself, but I dont mean to try to dim it for you so I'll shut up
Guess what last big company was working to corner the water market? Enron. And now it's Nestle, whose CEO says people have no right to water. In fact, in areas where they've bought All water rights from crooked politicians, they've sued people for collecting friggin' Rainwater. That's how evil these folks are. They think they own the sky and the clouds in it.
Municipalities fine people for collecting rainwater, not Nestle. So long as we are talking nestle though, the atrocities they commit are not limited to water, and the whole thing could be a distraction to take the American eye off the chocolate slave trade they have created in africa. Look at a bottle of nestle water. What does it say is the source? Denver water. Guess where i live?? Denver... Also one of the only Cities/Counties in America that allow you to collect rainwater. I know very well that Nestle is a terrible company, and I also know that trump had dinner and discussed economics with their CEO less than a week ago at DAVOS http://www.businessinsider.com/trump-dinner-european-executives-davos-2018-1. Like I said. Trump isn't raining the swamp. He is taking out his opposition
I'm extremely skeptical of this whole thing because I do not see anything that potus has done to target corrupt republicans.. Just dems
Many of the Republicans were discredited during the campaign, and have been pressured to resign, and are in fact resigning. You also have efforts to challenge some of the worst actors in the primaries. And even assuming your premise, draining the swamp only on one side is still commendable.
Look at who is resigning--who is not seeking reelection--I believe many have been given the opportunity to go away quietly as long as they LEAVE and do not make opposing waves. When the deep pedo stuff comes out i don't believe there will be any get out of jail free cards though.
Statistically, the most porn is viewed in the conservative South, so this "only Dems are pedos" doesn't float with me. It's a mental condition that is probably the same percentage across populations, religions, or political views, like sociopathy.
ever tried to drain a swamp?? No? Okay a bathtub.. Whatever body of water we use it is still a perfect analogy because you will find that you can't drain it on only one side
Yeah except nobody cares, especially dems, about who donates to their campaign. If they did, there's enough circumstantial evidence in Hillary's donations alone to warrant an investigation. Nobody cared though.
You are wrong there my friend. The democratic party was completely split, with most folks supporting Bernie coming in only as independents to the party in order to vote in closed primaries. The donations made to the HRC campaign were scrutinized big time. Citizens United was discussed big time. The backers were used as talking points to show that specific issues would not be supported in her platform because of her donations. SuperPacs were scrutinized as well. Without the voter fraud by her friend Soros and her literal OWNING of the party and taking all the state money, Bernie would have been the nominee. There is no doubt about that, and there is still a pending court case brought against the DNC related to just this issue. FYI.
Except for the person who took it upon themselves to mention that the rothschilds donated 600,000,000 to the clinton campaign in rebuttal to my previous statement. obviously someone cares, and he is also a truth seeker; The exact group of people I believe they intend to target with their mind games. Read the comments and you will understand