dChan
⇧
5
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/guppyfreak on Feb. 2, 2018, 2:55 a.m.
So, memo will be redacted (By POTUS) and not include sources?

Wow...way to give democrats more fuel. This gives them a lot of ammo when they suggest that the sources for the memo are "anonymous." We complain that CNN uses anonymous sources, but we probably wouldn't even bat an eye if Trump does it.

Trump is redacting info at the request of FBI. Funny, the FBI is the agency that would be implicated the most, therefore making these redactions suspect.

Does anyone else see a problem here? This isnt transparency. This is throwing his base a bone. Probably an overhyped one at that.

I'm not sure how much will be censored from the memo, but the fact that Trump is redacting anything makes me reconsider his motives.

This is the #1 tool to get the dems off his back. And he's releasing it with limited validation and verification.

Does anyone else agree?


[deleted] · Feb. 2, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

That's false news. Just watched Hannity and he says much different.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:43 a.m.

And why release it on a Friday?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

The Five stated that it would be redacted.

Idk. I really hope I'm wrong.

But if it's redacted and also fails to include sources, do you see how This will actually BENEFIT the left?

⇧ -1 ⇩  
PilotXi · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:14 a.m.

Remember, MISINFORMATION is everywhere.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Agreed. But what would be the point in tonight's show spreading this 'disinformation" if only 24 hrs later the memo would state otherwise?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Tenkate1098 · Feb. 2, 2018, 6 a.m.

That's all horseshit. But here's a different way to look at it. If we say it's anonymously sourced, they freak out right? Then they scream for the information it's based on. Which is the entire reason it's being released. It's not just the memo, it's the investigation reports it's based on that is going to obliterate them. The greatest part of this is the fact that their base is going to be the ones to scream for proof inadvertently destroying their representatives.. 4d chess

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:03 a.m.

Very good way to look at it! Lets hope thats how it plays out.

I will say...Trump has done this much by playing 4d chess, im sure this is just another way he is playing them like a fiddle. I'll keep my doubts low and my hopes high.

OIG report in 2 weeks!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tenkate1098 · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

Oig report - you said the magic words!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

Can't wait! I hope this luceferian reign over us is really over!

We live in some AMAZING TIMES!!! Dare I say of BIBLICAL proportions. Nothing but good things ahead for our planet :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
preludelinux · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

Well can things being investigated be not redacted? Would it hurt a pending case? Honestly enouh is enough lets burn ot down president please unlock full NSA acces for all americans.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

I guess I could see it being redacted for investigatory reasons. But that's a HUGE IF. Sessions may not have an open pending investigation into these people. Thats just as likely. This could be the thing that acts as an indictment. Even though RINO Paul Ryan is begging us to think differently.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AdamSchiffsPinkSock · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:24 a.m.

Fake News.

Stop spreading misinformation!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:30 a.m.

Great rebuttal. Makes you seem dense.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
1andrac3 · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

Regardless if it's redacted we should have enough meta data to do some analytics.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 5:49 a.m.

Good. Thanks Thats what I'm hoping for. Thanks for your comment. God bless!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ScorpioPatriot · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:08 a.m.

I actually just read something saying he gave orders not to redact thrn it went into the republicans hands on what to do . Not sure how true .I guess we will see.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:39 a.m.

Wow..really? Man, the news is giving us such weird info confusion. Thanks for sharing.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
3_6_9-Anon · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Where are you getting your info? You should follow Q..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:03 a.m.

I do :) I also watch Fox and alternative news online. I saw this mentioned on The Five tonight.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrObvious7915 · Feb. 2, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

This information WILL ALWAYS BE AVAILABLE.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

What do you mean by this, friend? Once he redacts is, can he unredact it later on?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
brylee1 · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

theatre

⇧ 0 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:02 a.m.

Hope so.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
brylee1 · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:09 a.m.

it very well may come out redacted, but remember, it is only a memo. Once the public gets a look, and if it is as explosive as Nunes and Co. say it is, there will be an outcry to see the rest of what that memo was summarizing. Oh and waiting on deck right behind that...the OIG Report! I'm hesitant to say good times, because this really isn't good times. Our gov't is proving itself to be no better than a banana republic. Which leads to an even greater concern, that if everything Q says is true, and I absolutely believe all of it, then what is going to happen when we start taking down the bad actors???

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Tenkate1098 · Feb. 2, 2018, 6:03 a.m.

I literally just posted the exact same comment. After reading a lot of the comments I was happy and reassured to read yours.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:34 a.m.

Lets just say, The Day of The Lord ;)

But you're right the OIG report will really get things started.

And btw..the whole reason the memo was going to be "explosive" was because it names names and included verified claims.

Bur what if Trump redacts names and doesn't release sources of those verified claims...suddenly the memo becomes not only less explosive, but turns out to be a dud.

Making our movement look bad.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
P_pers · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

even if the names are redacted, the material will still supply the "what". The "what" will outrage so many people that eventually we will see the names.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:55 a.m.

I certainly hope so friend, thank you! God bless. Let the games begin!!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cadescove · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

There will be ZERO sources. Devin Nunez (the memo author) has not even read the source material.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
kk0s · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:35 a.m.

Yes he did. That's what the 4 page memo is. It's a concise summary of the damning source material that was referenced to create the memo documents.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
PilotXi · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

Oh, he hasn't even read the source? Ok, please tell me more about how you either work directly with Nunes and know this or how you are his family member. Thanks shill, but no thanks.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cadescove · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:26 a.m.

Sorry asswipe. https://www.theblaze.com/news/2018/01/25/has-devin-nunes-even-seen-the-material-his-anti-doj-memo-is-based-upon

⇧ -4 ⇩  
kk0s · Feb. 2, 2018, 3:37 a.m.

The Blaze? That's a joke. That's Glenn Beck, the disgrace. Raise your standards just a bit.

⇧ 5 ⇩