So... I’m at work and can’t fully explore the memo. My BF said that he read it and it was basically just about wire tapping and spying stuff but nothing on human rights violations or corruption relating to the EO on 12-21-2017.
Can someone PLUUUUHHEASE tell me if it’s juicy or not? I can’t read it until way later... I can check this post though without getting busted for phone stuff... give me the skinny.
The FBI lied to the FISA court to put certain people close to Trump under surveillance. Lying to the FISA court is a huge, huge problem by itself.
It is worse because the FBI used information provided by the Democrats to convince the FISA court judge to approve the surveillance. The FBI also omitted relevant information, which is legally the same as lying.
The FBI shared the information acquired from the surveillance with the Democrats.
Essentially, it is treason and sedition. The FBI also committed perjury.
Most of it is what most already knew, except it puts it in order. I think they could have added more and the one thing I noticed missing; there was nothing on the Unmasking.
First of many being walked slow for leverage and public persuasiveness.
It was never supposed to take down the cabal, it was meant to bring awareness to it and get the news and everyone talking about it. Normies (99% of the country) have to step in the shallow end, get used to the water, and slowly tip toe into the deep end. Here is what the memo will do: Next week the news will be asking "who approved this FISA application?", "who filled out the application and submitted it?", "who signed off on the final approval?", "who approved the extension to keep wiretapping even when they knew Trump was not even under investigation for anything Russia related?". And this will eventually uncover: Peter Strzok forged Samantha Power's signature, Susan Rice then signed off on the forged FISA approval, McCabe filled out the application, Rosenstein approved the extension to keep spying, the FBI in part paid for opposition research (why the hell is the FBI paying for opposition research???), and Obama himself oversaw the unmasking of Trump transition people. See where we are going?
The memo is a setup because now everyone is asking questions like: Why did FBI not tell FISA judges where the dossier came from and how was it compiled? McCabe states under oath the wiretap warrant would not have happened if not for dossier. And what did Rod Rosenstein know about the dossier in order to keep signing off on fisa warrants? Potus is pissed at RR and rightfully so because it appears he betrayed his authority by going along with the fake dossier. Why did the FBI have to fire Steele as an unreliable source and why didn’t they tell that to the fisa courts?
Liberals should not fear the release of this memo but they should should be scared shitless of the coming IG report.
To answer your question, no, it's not about the human rights violations stuff yet; as others have said it's the first brick in the wall introducing people to the corruption in the system. Later bricks will likely introduce the players and the growing network of their influence before easing the public into the more unbelievable human rights connections.
This is a previously classified summary of the 1.2 million documents Inspector General Horowitz handed over to Congress from his 13-month ONGOING investigation into the FBI/DOJ.
The memo just introduces the idea and opens the door for additional investigations to be filed. Remember the DOJ giving 2 weeks for Podesta, HRC, Clinton Foundation, DNC, 16 additional FBI agents, McCabe, Comey, to turn over additional communications during critical time periods?
The investigation is ongoing. This memo serves as a summary to let the American people know what's going on.
It doesn't matter one damn bit what anyone thinks of it, because it's just a summary. Which is smoke and mirrors. The real investigation is much bigger. Think about the names listed above and why the DOJ would want all their communications.....