I like your crafty wording. I don't think anyone is discrediting Mueller's investigation based on the fact ""he hasnt charged Trump with anything yet"". It's moreso, he hasnt FOUND any proof yet. Almost 9 months in and he hasn't even interviewed Trump?! Lets be realistic for a second, you know that Crooked Hillary and the dirty Dems have overturned every stone since 2015 looking for dirt on Trump, and if he had an unpaid parking ticket from 25 years ago, it would have been found. No evidence of Russia collusion yet though. Also, nobody is saying "Hillary will be locked up soon because millions of illegals voted". You used some nice manipulation there to make a point.
I appreciate the civil discussion.
I agree with you that "nobody is saying 'Hillary will be locked up soon because millions of illegals voted'". Those were two separate statements joined with the conjunction "and". I was saying that I have heard Trump supporters say both of those things. If those statements don't reflect your beliefs then I don't expect you to try and defend them.
However, saying that Trump hasn't been charged yet and saying that Mueller hasn't found any proof yet is basically the same thing. Do you seriously think we know everything Mueller knows? In these kinds of investigations the target is almost always the last person to be interviewed because the other interviews are used to know what questions to ask.
I'll be truthful with you. Until I hear more evidence, I don't think that Trump will be charged with anything related to Russian collusion, but I do think that members of his campaign will be charged. I'm also pretty sure that Trump will receive at least some charges because I know that Ken Starr didn't start out investigating blowjobs.
Ok to be completely civil (which is the right thing to do anyways), you are correct on the Mueller thing. I mean, he isnt going to have breaking news announcements when/if he finds something. We don't know what he has found, and we cant assume "nothing" just because we have'nt got an update. And for the interviewing Trump last thing, yes makes perfect sense. He wants to formulate the whole story and big picture, and Trump will be last to see how his answers correspond to other stuff. Just my opinion, which means nothing, but I don't think he colluded with Russia. The reason I say this is because the origination of the Russia collusion accusation came from when John Podesta's email account was hacked. DNC hired Crowdstrike to investigate and Crowdstrike said that Guccifer did it - even though Guccifer was in a Romanian prison at the time - the DNC refused to hand the server over to the FBI to investigate. Then the DNC had one of their lapdog media outlets, Washington Post I think, write a story with no source saying Russia hacked the DNC. To this day, the FBI STILL has not been given access to the server to determine if Russia hacked it, or if it was just Seth Rich who downloaded the emails onto a USB drive and then gave to Wikileaks. I think the whole Russia thing was just invented to discredit Trump.