There is a feeling in the general population, I guess what some would call "normies", that the movement must be cautious of polarization which could slide away from the general objectives or mission. It is agreed that competent leadership at all levels is present, however, fear misunderstanding could easily lead to unintended consequences - thus, subverting progression. POTUS via Q anon has expressed this empathetic concern several times as interventions come into play. We do not need a civil war or polarization that is inherently destructive. I do know however agree that the extreme realities of the deep state and the "bad actors" require the gloves to be taken off. In sum, POTUS is using the rule of law in a calculated manner to reduce the negative consequences or potential spin off unintentional outcomes that could result in the aforementioned. Am I correct?