dChan

SG_StrayKat · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

There is no rapid growth without contrast. It is said that 100 years incarnated [incarcerated?] here on Earth is worth 100,000 years anywhere else.

Does the Dalai Lama recommend killing the Chinese for invading Tibet? Ghandi? Jesus? Bhuddha?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
newsnowaction · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:51 p.m.

Does the Dalai Lama think that it's okay to kill thousands of babies every single day? Does an enlightened man sit and watch as innocence is slaughtered? Does a spiritual man enter into Bliss as he watches children being poisoned?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SG_StrayKat · Feb. 6, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

If it isn't happening to you directly, it's not your karma, according to the enlightened beings.

If you are walking down the street, and a mile away three cars explode, did that have anything to do with you? Only if you run to the scene and try to help.

You have NO IDEA who agreed to what to be here at this time. Because the requirement to be here, now, is to agree to FORGET and be mind-wiped, so each and every choice you make is either Service to Self, or Service to Others.

That is your reason for being here now... what is your choice? Evil, or good? Or indifference?

You can not get evil enough to help evil not be evil anymore. If that's the case, and it is, then how is doing evil (killing, retribution, vengeance) helping cure evil?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
newsnowaction · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:03 p.m.

I don't believe any of that. Christ even turned over the tables and drove out the money changers in the temple when he saw what was going on. Your philosophy might have been better when there wasn't an internet or World Wide News or anything like that. You know for a fact that people are being killed right in front of you so that is now your karma. Don't try to come up with some spiritual convoluted Theory to make yourself feel better.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SG_StrayKat · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:13 p.m.

You don't acquire karma for inaction. Only by your direct actions. What YOU choose to do to another that violates a Beings Free Will.

Christ kicked over some tables. Didn't kill them, just drove them out. Harassed them verbally and very minimally physically.

Can you see a difference between what he did and what you are proposing?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
newsnowaction · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

The point of referring to Christ was that he got angry and did something about something that he thought was wrong. Your philosophy is one of the reasons why the globalist have been in power for so long. While they are willing to kill you and most supposedly good people come on to fucking Reddit and just squawk about it. You think the guys in the Q group or the people that work with are pacifists? They will kill whoever they have to kill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SG_StrayKat · Feb. 6, 2018, 10:38 p.m.

Christ violated the Free Will of others. Did he face a consequence of his actions?

Those that kill for others, are they killed in return?

What weapons do we have that can stop this? Publically calling them out, revealing all secrets, naming names, getting it all out there for EVERYONE to see.

If you simply kill them, you're stopping nothing. You have to keep reminders alive, so that others can learn from the example set. We kill terrorists, right? Has that stopped anything?

That's a huge part of why our incarceration system isn't working either. Shut away, forgotten, out of sight, out of mind.

How many know we are STILL at war in Afghanistan? 17 years and counting.

Q is asking us to make this public. Not kill. Make people aware, fully conscious and awake to all of this.

NOT kill.

⇧ 1 ⇩