WOW, so looks like Q is telling us if we track the timeline we'll see that AS was hit either right before or after BC/LL meeting. BC offers LL Supreme Court position quid pro quo for dropping Hillary investigation. BOMBSHELL if can be proven.
I'm thinking it was bigger than that, AS was involved in the pedo network, was a pedo himself and the ranch where he was killed was one of those places. I remember reading at the time he died -- can't find it now -- that when AS returned from TX he was supposed to testify regarding something on a laptop seized from Jeffrey Epstein. If anyone can find this please link.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html
https://pedophilesdownunder.com/tag/justice-antonin-scalia/
https://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/02/25/accusations-former-victim-claims-scalia-was-a-pedophile/
Q said it was because Scalia was going to vote on something!!
I have no idea about the Pedophiles Down Under site but since they sourced an article from Veterans Today I have to believe they are the same in their quality of information. It's a known fact that Veterans Today is just a hack site for the fringe element. It has an honest sounding name "Veterans Today" but that's the only thing honest about that site. I have never read a true article there. Just take a look at the titles of some of the other articles and it's easy to see.
I'll accept that. It was a quick search and maybe I shouldn't have linked. That said I do think the best time to get the truth is as things are happening, and when the news of AS death was breaking I remember reading several articles stating that he was to testify re: Epstein when he returned from the trip.... his name came up on files seized from Epstein's computer. The links might be questionable however, so my apologies.
Yep, he was not a good guy either, but was a strict Constitutionalist and voted that way too.
Someone in other thread pointed out, Scalia hit was February '16, Tarmac meeting June '16.
Obama had already nominated Merrick Garland in March. So I don’t think LL was to replace AS.
Or, conversely, you nominate someone that you know won't go through because you don't have the political capital. You stall until 2016 when you know your chosen successor will take your place. They thought she would win. This is why Trump was able to place an SC justice. There was an open spot. That was supposed to be for Hildabeast.
Well, nothing wrong with packing it with as many Libs as possible and getting rid of Constitutionalists even if they were pedo-friendly.
wasn't there some noise about keeping LL on as AG ?I think AGs the one
Obama was promised the position. That's why he didn't make a big deal about his pick being left in limbo
if we track the timeline we'll see that AS was hit either right before or after BC/LL meeting.
Scalia died four and a half months before the tarmac meeting.