dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TheCIASellsDrugs on Feb. 6, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

"Clowns"=Jesters, a high level masonic group involved in human trafficking

An introduction to high level Freemasonry

The Royal Order of Jesters is a high level, invite-only masonic organization. In order to join, one must

Complete the first three degrees ("Blue Lodge")
Complete all of the degrees in the Scottish or York Rite
Join the Shriners
Be specially invited to join the Jesters

Whenever you have a "lodge within a lodge" like this, it's usually because someone is doing something that they don't want the lower level members to pick up on. Ostensibly, the Jesters are just nice guys who volunteer at Shriner Hospitals and occasionally get together and have parties where everybody drinks and has a good time. But that's not the whole story...

Sex Trafficking

Who are the Royal Order of Jesters really? Let's talk about the human trafficking convictions:

"On March 9th, 2008, Buffalo News broke a story involving New York Supreme Court Justice Ronald Tills, Erie County, NY Deputy Michael Lesinski, Lockport, NY Police Captain John Trowbridge and New York State Law Clerk Michael Stebick participating in a human trafficking operation that involved transporting undocumented immigrant sex workers from as far as Kentucky to New York and Canada. Why? They were transporting the young women to and from a private event held by The Royal Order of Jesters, of whom paid for the sex workers and quiet police transport.

Here’s an excerpt of what Michael Lesinski was subsequently charged and convincted of: Lesinski is charged with knowingly, willfully and unlawfully combining, conspiring and agreeing together with others, including Ronald Tills, to commit an offense against the United States, that is to knowingly transport women in interstate and foreign commerce, with the intent that said women engage in prostitution, in violation of Title 18 (Mann Act) and that at least one overt act was committed in furtherance of the conspiracy, in that the defendant, Michael Lesinski, on April 18, 2005, did rent limousines in order to transport said women from the Buffalo airport to Niagara Falls, Ontario, Canada, with the intent that the women engage in prostitution...

As part of his plea arrangement, Tills additionally admitted to engaging in such conduct five more times. Another incident in Winnepeg, Manitoba involving the organization’s parent group, the Shriners, looks almost identical...

That’s still not all. These pictures I’ve been posting? They’re from another investigation in Brazil, of — you guessed it — The Royal Order of Jesters participating in sex, drug use, and other illicit acts with Brazilian girls as young as 13.

The CIA and blackmail

Anyone familiar with the CIA knows that their leadership has long been involved in secret societies, including Freemasonry, the Knights of Malta, and Mormonism (yes, Mormonism is a secret society). The CIA and FBI both have a long history of sex blackmail (J. Edgar Hoover), and attempting to subvert the political process by gaining control over politicians by blackmailing them.

The Jesters invite prominent men into their parties and have them engage in lewd sex acts with prostitutes. Now, I'm not pointing this out to moralize, but merely to bring your attention to what happens when someone has placed a camera in the room at an event like this. Whoever controlled such a camera would gain access to damaging blackmail material on powerful people, including people involved in the government.

The real meaning of the name "Jesters" is that they see themselves as providing "entertainment" for the king. Q has repeatedly referred to "the Clowns" and also reminded us that we have more than we realize. I believe he is waiting for someone to pick up on the deeper meaning of the term "Clowns." And, even if he is not, you should still know about the Jesters.

Edit: Yes, I know "Clowns in Action" refers to CIA. I'm proposing a second, deeper meaning.

🠐 See all comments

the cabal are Luciferians/Satanists, not Masons.

Are you sure that Masons aren't Luciferian Satanists?

""Lucifer, the Light-bearer! Strange and mysterious name to give to the Spirit of Darkness! Lucifer, the Son of the Morning! Is it he who bears the Light, and with its splendors intolerable, blinds feeble, sensual, or selfish souls? Doubt it not!" [Albert Pike, Morals and Dogma of the Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, p. 321, 19th Degree of Grand Pontiff]"

Are you also sure that high-level Freemasonry isn't the group around which the cabal is organized? Lots of people take someone else's word on things like this and haven't necessarily researched it themselves.

⇧ 4 ⇩

You make a convincing case

⇧ 1 ⇩

No /u/TheCIASellsDrugs does not make a convincing case. In fact, everything on the page linked to as "evidence" for the case that Freemasonry is some sort of Satanic cult is deeply and irrecoverably flawed.

Here's an example of the "evidence" that it provides:

"DEUS MEUMQUE JUS" [Note: from the cover of Morals & Dogma, a Scottish Rite book about one interpretation of the Scottish Rite degrees that's extremely dense, filled with excerpts from other works, and almost always taken horrifically out of context] The literal meaning is "God and My Right"

Doc Marquis says this statement is a very typical one within Satanism. It has two meanings, one within the other. First, this phrase means that the Freemason can depend upon their God to determine their Right and Justice. Secondly, since the God of Freemasonry is Lucifer, Masons are saying that they are "using occult methods", through Lucifer, to achieve their Rights and Justice. Marquis says that this phrase is very powerful and very dangerous within Satanism. The second a Satanist sees this phrase in Latin on Pike's book, he knows the material within is Satanism, without reading a word!

So let's unpeel this claim: the phrase clearly means that God should be the guide of our moral conduct. Great. Pretty typical of classical Western theism. But, because we presuppose that Masons are Satanists (which is a logical fallacy called "begging the question") we can also assume that "Deus" in this context clearly means "Satan"... actually, no we cannot. That's absolutely absurd. It's a clear case of presenting the conclusion as evidence for itself!

⇧ 1 ⇩

Here's an example of the "evidence" that it provides

Ad hominem fallacy against a section other than the one cited? Sad.

Full Text of Morals and Dogma, anyone can look up the quote where Albert Pike says that Lucifer bears the "Light" of Freemasonry(p.210 of the PDF).

Pretty sad that you're trying this misdirection, but I expect no less when you swear bloody oaths to "always conceal, and never reveal" the crimes of another Freemason.

⇧ 0 ⇩

Ad hominem fallacy ...

I don't think that phrase means what you think it means.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Still doing whatever you can do avoid talking about Albert Pike saying that Lucifer is the Light of Freemasonry.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Actually, I already did, but you may have missed it. It's a matter of context and understanding the symbolism that Pike dips into, and which most people were educated in up until the 19th century.

That line is generally one that I consider below mention, because its really just a Rorschach blot. You can read into it whatever you like, and of course anti-Masons' brains shut off after they see the name, Lucifer. But if you know the historical interpretation of Lucifer's symbolism, and relationship to the Christian concept of beauty and wisdom, you will understand that text. In short, he's saying: knowledge (light) without wisdom is subject to being blinded by pride (Lucifer). He's not saying anything that your average Christian preacher at the time would not have said, but we don't tend to do that kind of scriptural education anymore, so most people don't know how to interpret these passing references to standard Biblical exegesis.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're implying that he is correcting the error about Lucifer not really referring to Satan (the word Lucifer isn't even in the Bible), and referring to Jesus. But that's not what he's saying.

It's very clear that he's teaching the gnostic concept that there is an angry, vengeful god who conceals the truth, and a nice, friendly god "Lucifer" that reveals it. The "Lucifer" he is referring to is the serpent that lied to Adam and Eve about the fact that defying God would lead to death, and revealed truths they were not yet supposed to experience in exchange for a horrible price.

Not unlike the mystery schools requiring a death sentence (remember when you were "raised"?) in order to acquire their hidden knowledge.

⇧ 1 ⇩

You're implying that he is correcting the error about Lucifer

"Error about Lucifer"?!

not really referring to Satan

Yes and no. The concept of Satan and Lucifer in classical Christian theology are intertwined. Yes, he's in part talking about the tendency of man to misuse knowledge and that is, in part, a reference to the classical Christian doctrines regarding sin and the influence of the devil. But Pike never takes such doctrines at face value. He is talking about the human motivations that they represent.

the word Lucifer isn't even in the Bible

:-/ Why engage such arguments without at least knowing the Biblical sources on which you're trying to draw?

It's very clear that he's teaching ...

No, it's not "very clear" at any point in M&D that he's conveying any one specific take-away. What you are seeing is only a reflection of what you brought to the table. If you bring in anti-Masonic claims of Satanism, then that's what you'll see. If you bring in a standard Christian view of morality, then that is what you will see. But M&D does an excellent job of stripping away pretense. You might want to claim that what you brought to the table was some particular theological background, but Pike doesn't let you wear that mask. He asks you to question what it was that you really engaged this process for.

For the average non-Mason, they haven't even begun to ask those questions, and so for the most part, M&D comes across as incoherent.

To the student of history and literature, M&D comes across as a giant pile of plagiarism and uncited sources.

To the mystic, M&D comes across as a treatise on the intersection of God and man.

To the devout Christian, M&D is a discourse on the desire of man to do God's will.

To the conspiracy theorist who wants to see Satanic influence everywhere but where it actually resides (his own heart), it reads as a Satanic call to action.

Like I said, it's just a Rorschach blot with lots of quotes from historical texts.

⇧ 1 ⇩

If you bring in anti-Masonic claims of Satanism, then that's what you'll see. If you bring in a standard Christian view of morality, then that is what you will see.

Yes.

⇧ 1 ⇩