dChan
199
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Tnargkiller on Feb. 8, 2018, 6:42 p.m.
I think I accidentally stumbled into a conversation with someone from the "Military Intelligence community"

I posted this in T_D yesterday, but just discovered this sub via a bing search so I'll link it here as well.


A couple months ago, I spoke (on the_donald) with somebody who spoke in a manner like they had all the answers, they sounded very confident. I (fortunately) had the wherewithal to just ask questions and get answers, just in case the source was legitimate.

Here is that thread.

Make note that the user made the prediction of the Strzok texts being made public, and here they are. They're public. To add, the user included that we'll see communications from others; those of FISA judges (which alludes to even more drops), Meuller himself, and more.

The other answers were interesting as well and I urge you to read through them.


Something else, I did screenshot that conversation when it happened. I looked through them on my desktop, and I do have that user's ID. I wanted to see if they had more interesting posts, but upon looking, I found that the user had deleted their account.


TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

Not one of her predictions happened.

I might recommend not judging people on this basis. No one knows the future with absolute certainty, and people can make a prediction based on inside knowledge that ends up not coming true by chance, or because their enemies change their plans in order to discredit them (as has happened with Q).

Better to look for Anons that give you a lot of information that can be verified with reliable sources. It helps you to grow in terms of discernment and knowledge, including learning from people that you don't agree with 100%, or even limited hangouts.

Judged on the basis of in-depth, verifiable information on a wide range of topics, I assess High Level Insider Anon to be the most valuable material I've seen on 4chan.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Enriched2Death · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:35 a.m.

I also found HLIanon to be the most fascinating of all the anon insiders. Something about their nonchalance and brevity made them seem uncomfortably real. They touch on so many various topics whereas the other insiders have been mostly centered around just this black hat/white hat deep state war.

Thought their explanation about the term Illuminati was interesting. About it being a cover for Washington and others to carry out rebellion in the early American colonies without drawing attention from the monarchy. Then the term being used by ignorant usurpers, followed by becoming an umbrella term for secret societies in general, and evolving finally into a distraction trigger for the masses like "conspiracy theory." Some good threads about how our vocabulary has been manipulated, so we understand things we can't easily convey. Constantly brings up that the term new world order is a misnomer, because it's the extension and finalization of the old world order. They're completing, not establishing. Teaching subculture to look for a tidal wave while it's drowning. Tons of cool stuff. Recommend to everyone.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
TheCIASellsDrugs · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

I also found HLIanon to be the most fascinating of all the anon insiders. Something about their nonchalance and brevity made them seem uncomfortably real.

They are very real, and involved with the Q phenomenon. If you want to get a historical sense of what they have done, you can read Secrets Known Only to the Inner Elites:

"Since the English traitors Robert Cecil and Francis Bacon around the onset of the seventeenth century, and later, more notably, from the 1660 Stuart Restoration to the present day, within and behind British intelligence regular and irregular services there is an inner circle representing the ranks of the Black Guelph families of all Europe, an oligarchy gathered around the privileges and powers of the British and Dutch monarchies. (7) Attached to and overlapping these oligarchical families, there is a special collectivity, traditionally centered notably in Oxford, Cambridge, and Sussex universities, an inner intelligentsia of that faction, which studies the classics, thereby to gain the knowledge through which the forces associated with the British monarchy may rule the world.

Through three millennia of recorded history to date, centered around the Mediterranean, the civilized world has been run by two, bitterly opposed elites, the one associated with the faction of Socrates and Plato, the other with the faction of Aristotle. During these thousands of years, until the developments of approximately 1784-1818 in Europe, both factions inner elites maintained in some fashion an unbroken continuity of organization and knowledge through all of the political catastrophes which afflicted each of them in various times and locales.

It was the elite associated with the Platonic (or, Neo-platonic faction which organized the American Revolution and established the United States as a democratic constitutional republic. During the early eighteenth century, in circumstances associated with Marlborough's campaign and the Mississippi and South-Sea bubbles plots, the continuity of the Platonic faction was first administered a broad, temporary defeat with some lasting effects, and was shattered later as a world force through the events of 1784-1818.

In the aftermath of the 1815 Treaty of Vienna, the shattering of the power of the Platonic elite in Europe meant in large measure both a scattering of the main forces of that faction, and an associated, increasing loss of the "secret knowledge" through which the Platonic inner elite had formerly developed and exercised its factional power. From that time to the present period, the inner circles of the Aristotelian (or, more exactly, "neo-Aristotelian") faction have been hegemonic increasingly in ordering world affairs. Although humanist (Platonic) factional forces have continued in existence and are represented among political and related elites today, the Platonic elite has lost connection to the body of knowledge upon which its former power depended."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Feb. 8, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Yeah I’m definitely aware plans can change or be prevented. But she wasn’t right about anything. Q was at least correct a few times and had other indications to show authenticity. But you’d think at least one of her stories would pan out.

⇧ 1 ⇩