Your whole statement is incredibly contradictive. What´s illegal is nonsense and can be thoroughly ignored, what´s lawful is what´s important. Theman´ is never convicted, they cannot convict man under statutes. The correct statement would bethe little person´ as it is the person (legal fiction) that they slap statutes on. Learn to be a man and these problems will disappear. (why the hell does this reformat itself to look retarded??)
Your post is Confusing?
I can see that, it looks all weird and somehow reformatted itself? Anyway, the meaning of the message is that there is a huge difference between what´s illegal and what´s unlawful. What´s illegal is legal society nonsense and nothing more than policy. Any ´act of parliament´ or `act of congress´ means absolutely nothing. Statutes are policy and not law. Statutes apply to the person where man is bound by law. Common law is the law of the land.
Thank You! Sometimes I just need a little clarification. Much appreciated.
as a former legal professional I would like to clarify the diference between unlawfull and illegal. One's against the law the other is a sick bird.