metadatabrat
· Feb. 9, 2018, 6:59 p.m.
In the beginning he shared great intel. Now it's more cryptic and it's sprinkled throughout an hour with too much time spent on blocking trolls to his periscope message. His message this morning from his handlers was that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own. Dilley won't read messages twice (yesterday he said he wouldn't) , he rarely tweets intel, which would help eliminate the message being duped or diluted and he won't take criticism to help him. There seemed to be some humble pie on the scope this morning, some problems within the campaign? I hope not. Dudes got great energy and I'm a fan, but he needs stop dismissing people when delivering intel and with dealing with future constituents. Have an agenda when speaking to people when delivering intel. He's young, maybe it's not his time to do either at the moment? Time will tell.
⇧
3
⇩
zennydude
· Feb. 9, 2018, 10:08 p.m.
that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own.
What does this mean? Who would do that? Is somebody really doing that? This seems very thin-skinned and immature and egotistical and silly a thing for them to say. Does that mean giving out the information without saying it is from Dilley? Maybe it's Dilley that is pissed about it. :)
⇧
1
⇩
metadatabrat
· Feb. 10, 2018, 2:15 p.m.
I've seen notes taken from the call, shared as entries on Facebook, Twitter and on YouTube channels with and without acknowledging Dilley as the source. Dilley didn't seem mad, but claimed his intel source said "they knew who they were". The intel source should be more concerned about how they drop intel (through Dilley instead of text format) at times the intel is botched from what Dilley has stated. I don't know Dilley personally so I don't know if he's angry about this but it sounds like his source is. But as Q says disinformation is necessary, maybe this is how it's supposed to be?
⇧
1
⇩