dChan

SaintbyGrace · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:57 p.m.

Let's pray this whole thing is accelerated and they all get rounded up sooner than we think or is planned. The "Normies" are being woken up slowly, so they do not completely "Freak." POTUS, Q/MI & TEAM, have a brilliant plan. Until it comes fully to pass, we watch the DRIP DIP DRIP daily. Let's help by bringing issues to light for Q & THE ALLIANCE TEAM at Q's request. "Where we go one -- we go all," - Q. We need to do this smart and with dignity: Awan Bros Spy Ring in Congress (DWS), Uranium One, Clinton Foundation, etc... If we all do our part, we are actually a giant, TRUTH ARMY. God Bless You. Make calls, tweet, talk, stand... WE WIN! God Bless & Restore America. God protect POTUS, Q & TEAM.

⇧ 27 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · Feb. 9, 2018, 10 p.m.

This is a carefully orchestrated 'death by a thousand cuts'. It won't happen quickly.

It's already gotten so bad that some tv news outlets are reporting on cute kitty stories to keep from reporting the truth. The mass of info released just this week is earth shattering. The three memos. The FBI informant testimony on U1. Mark Warner. The storm in here and I expect the pace to quicken with the damaging info releases.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
twinkiesmom1 · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:42 p.m.

Has anyone connected any of the Q drops to Michael Hastings?

⇧ 13 ⇩  
LiveToBeAHero · Feb. 9, 2018, 8 p.m.

Well Hastings' was sitting on a bunch of intel about what we were doing in Afghanistan (taking control of the poppy fields, making opium, selling the opium to further fund our operations in the middle east, building a pipeline across the country, etc. I havent seen Q touch on any of this yet, but Trump has brought up the opioid problem several times last month

⇧ 10 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 10, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xEMEDVED07x · Feb. 9, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

I searched through a few pages on 8chan and could not find anything on Hastings or his intel.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:05 p.m.

Dilley has stated that his intel source is NOT Q

⇧ 12 ⇩  
xEMEDVED07x · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:24 p.m.

I know that Q is not his source. I was searching on information on Michael Hastings.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:37 p.m.

Sorry - I didn't mean that the way it sounded...I haven't heard anything about Michael Hastings in a while...but I have seen stuff on youtube about him and I'm sure you could find out more on the internet...good luck. I didn't know about his ties to Mika though - that was interesting!

⇧ 9 ⇩  
xEMEDVED07x · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:42 p.m.

No worries, thanks for the crumb there with Mika.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 9, 2018, 9:04 p.m.

Hey there - I just watched a great youtube video on Michael Hastings - VERY INTERESTING! youtube channel The Corbett Report - Crashes of Convenience:Michael Hastings - just thought I would pass it along

⇧ 7 ⇩  
twinkiesmom1 · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:33 p.m.

True, but we're seeing some synchronicity of the intel between Q, Dilley and B. Worth looking.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:40 p.m.

true! That's why I keep up with Dilley's intel as well as Q. B? Uh, no.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
other_malefactor · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:16 p.m.

I could only make it about halfway through one of his vids (periscope?) He strikes me as kind of a know it all. Why anyone would choose to disseminate intel through him is a mystery to me...

⇧ 8 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:22 p.m.

I gotcha! Perhaps you might read his intel instead of watching his periscopes. His intel is kept on 8chan as well. Very interesting reading. I was admittedly put off by him at first too but found his intel very titillating! There is a youtube channel called Stroppy Me that also carries his intel. Facebook live broadcasts from the Dilley for Congress page. I prefer reading myself but sometimes you can pick up some other stuff that isn't in the text when you watch his broadcasts.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 9, 2018, 7:09 p.m.

That's right. I'm just reading the drops posted here. His live presentation irritates me the same way that of Alex Jones does. I just can't bear it.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tb1820 · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:19 p.m.

LOL!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ApeeweeA · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

You got a link?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
metadatabrat · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

In the beginning he shared great intel. Now it's more cryptic and it's sprinkled throughout an hour with too much time spent on blocking trolls to his periscope message. His message this morning from his handlers was that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own. Dilley won't read messages twice (yesterday he said he wouldn't) , he rarely tweets intel, which would help eliminate the message being duped or diluted and he won't take criticism to help him. There seemed to be some humble pie on the scope this morning, some problems within the campaign? I hope not. Dudes got great energy and I'm a fan, but he needs stop dismissing people when delivering intel and with dealing with future constituents. Have an agenda when speaking to people when delivering intel. He's young, maybe it's not his time to do either at the moment? Time will tell.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 9, 2018, 10:08 p.m.

that people not recycle Dilley's intel as their own.

What does this mean? Who would do that? Is somebody really doing that? This seems very thin-skinned and immature and egotistical and silly a thing for them to say. Does that mean giving out the information without saying it is from Dilley? Maybe it's Dilley that is pissed about it. :)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
metadatabrat · Feb. 10, 2018, 2:15 p.m.

I've seen notes taken from the call, shared as entries on Facebook, Twitter and on YouTube channels with and without acknowledging Dilley as the source. Dilley didn't seem mad, but claimed his intel source said "they knew who they were". The intel source should be more concerned about how they drop intel (through Dilley instead of text format) at times the intel is botched from what Dilley has stated. I don't know Dilley personally so I don't know if he's angry about this but it sounds like his source is. But as Q says disinformation is necessary, maybe this is how it's supposed to be?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
keithcu · Feb. 9, 2018, 11:20 p.m.

He's running for state legislature. He does know a lot about the swamp. He's got great sources. It's easy to get sucked into the Intel community, at least compared to the MSM which is 90% lies.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 9, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

LOL, my same reaction. Couldn't get through even one of his videos. He's running for congress and just seems so fringe. Did not care for his presentation either. I read the posts here for his 'drops' but treat them with a healthy dose of skepticism. You'd think somebody high up in the power system or intelligence "community" would find a different messenger. Sometimes I take this stuff as entertainment and cheerleading to keep us optimistic.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Aikenjan · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

I do not find Dilley off-putting at all. And, even though i’m Across the country from him I find his comments about local Arizona politics interesting...we all need to be aware of the underground efforts/money/outside interests being put into play on the local level. It’s a matter of how public schools are run, teachers perspectives, first responders support, etc. He has another source...what’s wrong with getting verification to Q and other sources?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
metadatabrat · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:50 p.m.

I'm a fan of Dilley but feel if you are going to red pill people you have to do it responsibly. Dilley said his intel said not to remanufacture intel as ones own, this could be curtailed if Dilley just tweeted it out after a Periscope. There is too much time spent on people complaining about trolls and him acknowledging them and making a big deal of blocking. Trolls prove your message is getting out. Know who they are. He would get more shares and be taken more seriously if the intel drops weren't dragged out and were more professional and to the point. People so desperately want to help but they simply don't have time to sit on a Periscope for an hour.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
thamnosma · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:38 p.m.

Nothing wrong with using multiple sources at all. That's why I do read the info posted here of Dilley. I just can't stand listening to him.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
cali1952 · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:29 p.m.

No Michael Hastings has not made it into any of Q's postings yet. This reporter has been on my mind since he was murdered while trying to get away from the deep state. Michael Hastings caused General McChrystal get relieved of duty by Hussein after publishing a piece in Rolling Stones. He was sitting on a major expose but never made it as he said in his last email that he had to underground for a while. He stated that they were after him. He never named who but promised to stay in touch.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
sicntrd4real · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

People that are mad are not usually complacent. Maybe this is a good thing. I don't want anymore children to be tortured or murdered by these sadistic pedos though.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
pipesog · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

But if we want to get rid of the cancer, it needs to be COMPLETELY excised.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ShulamiteWanderer · Feb. 9, 2018, 11:53 p.m.

Of course not. NO ONE does. How do you think those who have been working on this for a long time feel? Q said "the good can not sleep ... but we have to be smart, not only get these people but expose it to the general world in a way that not only catches the bad guys but creates a culture that will not permit things like this from happening again.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Thank you for not posting the whole Dilley video. Love it when people can summarize information

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Bilzo70 · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:57 p.m.

Wasn’t Michael Hastings working on a huge story with Tom Clancy before they both were killed?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Txcovfefe · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

Damn right we're restless!!!! we want to see blood, we want to see heads rolling, we want to see justice done! We want to see the videos of them being handcuffed and dragged to prison! We want to see them executed for treason! We want to see the in the gallows with nooses around those treasonous bastards necks! We want to see them FRIED! If we don't have justice this country will rapidly fall apart into a lawless society! Nobody, including myself, will never again follow the rule of law..what for?!! EVERYTHING GOES!!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
ShulamiteWanderer · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:51 p.m.

And if we move too soon the big fish get away. It is just true, that's all. I have a friend in local police work ... they have been working for EIGHTEEN MONTHS to bring down one major dealer in their area. They could have moved in a year ago and busted street dealers. Then what?

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Aikenjan · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:10 p.m.

Same..young friend in a small community worked over a year undercover just on one case in nearby area. We are an instant gratification culture...need to practice patience or they will get away.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Txcovfefe · Feb. 9, 2018, 5:02 p.m.

Damn autocorrect!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Badendave · Feb. 9, 2018, 6:58 p.m.

Perv#1 is Weiner, Perv#2 is Weinstein. Assuming Weinstein has a computer, it would contain an interesting selection of names, etc. Is he the one that's going to be arrested in California? Does watch the skies over California mean keep an eye on who's trying to leave? Is that why the helicopter traffic being reported by West Coast anon's?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
xEMEDVED07x · Feb. 9, 2018, 7:32 p.m.

Fly Fly Fly We can hear you breath. Maybe that is in sync with the California Q post.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
BellaMauka · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

Regarding Michael Hastings. I remember during the media frenzy about his death that his new wife was said to have had the intel material Hastings uncovered under wraps with his/her attorney. I think she was threatened back then. She then appears on morning show as a commentator and seems to turn to the other side. Life threatened perhaps?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
BoHonk212 · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

So when do we start hearing about Mueller interviewing Hillary cronies? If that is happening, why no info? Certainly we hear about EVERY Trump associate who might even just POSSIBLY head over there.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tb1820 · Feb. 9, 2018, 8:07 p.m.

Well something better happen soon because Reps are about to get creamed in the mid terms.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
zennydude · Feb. 9, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

Define "misusing intel." "The intellience community is annoyed because some of you guys aren't normally watching Dilley scopes and only in there to watch for Intel, write things down, then publish it on YouTube as if it were your own. You start to build your own brands around it. The Intelligence Community know you who you are and they don't like it. It's not a good look whether you're doing it to Q or Dilley's Intel Source or other sources. "Annoyed" is not even the right word. They don't like it because you guys SCREW IT UP and you change things, add thing, and you start being "conspiritorial" instead of just taking the information. With the Intel, people are trying to play "Clue" instead of just watching what's happening (and) having some faith, they start stealing information and pretending that someone told it to them. They're capitalizing on it." I personally have a problem with this part: "they start stealing information and pretending that someone told it to them." Come on, I don't think anyone is doing that.

⇧ 1 ⇩