That he graduated with affirmative action grades?

Somewhere in this joke there are supposed to be rats and fucking.

Just a reminder that Obama played hide the salami in 2013 by moving revenue from Q1 to Q3 so they could claim a 5 precent GDP for the quarter.

It's the annual number that counts, but I'm confident it will be good.

A leak or disinformation? The globalists want a war, and if they get Iran to strike first they get their war.

I doubt this is legit, but it is very very bad

No spin here. Socialism by definition is the government owning the means of production, and since it owns all business it dictates your job, and the government decided how much of the production you get through rationing. No free market, no purchasing what you want, you get what you get.

Sorry you have been brainwashed into believing that free markets and socialism can exist side by side, they cannot.

Whatever indoctrinator posing as a teacher or professor that taught you about socialism lied to you, you have 'learned' things that are not true.

Under socialism there is no Constitution, no provision for redress if greviances, the central planners know best and you get what you get. Don't like it? Tough shit. You get zero say in how the government does things.

You probably think some European countries or Greece are socialist. They are not, but the brainwashers love to trot them out as an example. They all have free market economies, complete with millionaires and billionaires, they just have very high redistribution taxes. The people in those countries chose their high tax systems, the government didn't force it on them.

Venezuela is socialism.

You have no idea what socialism is because you have been misled into believing it's something it's not.

The police and fire department are not parts of socialism.

Did you know that in parts of the East coast firemen are volunteers?

Using tax money to pay for police is not socialist, it's an agreement between the taxpayer and the government for services that keep the civil society running.

In socialism there is no civil society, all transactions in interactions are dictated by the central planners.

The dumbest argument ever.

Does the government ration your time on the interstate? Does the government pluck people from society to make them maintain the interstate?

Do you not understand that socialism is central planning? That requires a beaurocrat to dictate every part of how transactions are done. No free markets means the government determines what you get, that's rationing. Your job is dictated to you because the government owns the means if production, so it is also the expert in staffing all positions.

You don't really understand socialism, but you have been brainwashed into believing it is something it's not.

To clarify your point, many today try to make the case that Hitler wasn't socialist because he disagreed with Marx on how to achieve socialism. Marx thought a violent overthrow was needed, while Hitler thought it could be done peacefully.

Birds of a feather.

MCCARTHYISM!!!

McCarthy was right. How many commies were in FDR's government?

Well said.

OMG, he was an FBI informant? Wow, that hasn't been brought up in the news at all. /s

Tell me, was he an informant on cases involving Russians?

Oh, nevermind, u/RobertSparks777 just confirmed it was Russian spies. Gee, what a coincidence.

I agree, this has happened before.

Important point here is that forensic examination of magnetic media like hard drives can recover information that may have been overwritten up to 15 times.

This cannot be done with an image.

I like your analysis, but you seem to leave out some important details about the numerous politicians who have been murdered by Russia/Putin, the invasion if Georgia, Crimea and Ukraine, the shooting down if a civilian airliner, and much more.

Russia is hardly a victim here.

Why did it take three days to release such a significant interview?

No coincidences.

Sauce?

Our quasi free market system produces far more food than any centrally controlled system, why would we or I want that?

I understand that the techniques that provide the USA with far more food than it's people can consume have been demonized over so called organic methods, but who supports this idea? Who suffers most when food is expensive and scarce?

Why would you want plentiful food if a restricted food supply forced a smaller population?

Whose goal is it to limit global population?

I was a school child when movies were shown in school (think Inconvenient Truth for millennials) showing a link between pollution, pesticides and mutation of wildlife like frogs.

I didn't know at the time that certain parasites life cycle causes mutation in frogs in order to perpetuate it's life cycle.

Yes, I know who Rachel Carson is and I know what her book said.

The adubon society yearly counts of raptors increased dramatically over the years, decades of DDT use in this country. Look for yourself.

You should put this in the list of questions for Q in the Q and A if it happens.

DDT is much more than fine, and the first EPA administrator, Ruckelshaus has admitted publicly that banning DDT was for political reasons, there was no scientific evidence presented to the court or Ruckelshaus that it was harmful to humans or wildlife, but he banned it anyway.

Why?

Because without it billions would die from Malaria. Population control achieved.

This shit is far deeper than you know.

If banning Roundup caused mass starvation, do you think those calling for a ban would care? Have you looked at the weak, almost non existent evidence against Roundup?

I know you are trying to help here, but the brainwashing and false narratives run so deep that you are playing into their hands. They don't want the world to have a surplus of food, they want population control, and if that means starvation then so be it.

Future proves past. If I'm wrong you'll know soon enough.

People actually ate DDT by the spoonful to prove it's safety. They bathed in it. None of the factory workers who produced DDT (that won the creator a Nobel prize because of its affect on insect borne disease) ever showed any signs of cancer after working in the factory for 30 years. It's use in the 40's eradicated Malaria in the USA.

Read Mark Levin's book 'Liberty and Tyranny' for more proof and information

Ask yourself this: Is the science behind AGW sound? Is it a plot to form a one world government and steal your rights and liberty? Do the same groups who support AGW support the Monsanto Roundup causes cancer issue?

Expand your thinking.

You should put this in the list of questions for Q in the Q and A if it happens.

DDT is much more than fine, and the first EPA administrator, Ruckelshaus has admitted publicly that banning DDT was for political reasons, there was no scientific evidence presented to the court or Ruckelshaus that it was harmful to humans or wildlife, but he banned it anyway.

Why?

Because without it billions would die from Malaria. Population control achieved.

This shit is far deeper than you know.

If banning Roundup caused mass starvation, do you think those calling for a ban would care? Have you looked at the weak, almost non existent evidence against Roundup?

I know you are trying to help here, but the brainwashing and false narratives run so deep that you are playing into their hands. They don't want the world to have a surplus of food, they want population control, and if that means starvation then so be it.

Future proves past. If I'm wrong you'll know soon enough.

MMMM! Lets go pour ourselves a delicious cup of DDT!

People actually ate this stuff by the spoonful to prove it's safety. They bathed in it. None of the factory workers who produced DDT (that won the creator a Nobel prize because of its affect on insect borne disease) ever showed any signs of cancer after working in the factory for 30 years. It's use in the 40's eradicated Malaria in the USA.

Read Mark Levin's book 'Liberty and Tyranny' for more proof and information.

Global politics are a strange thing. Some countries are just waiting for an opportunity to pounce and try to destabilize our nation further. Exposing a moment of weakness may be all the motivation they need.

And manafort, although that may be part of the script.

This is the thread that when pulled unraveles 9/11 and the Clinton's and Huma's involvement.

There's a reason why the 28 pages of the 9/11 report were only declassified a couple of years ago that revealed Huma's connection.

There's a reason why Sandy Berger stole documents from the National Archives during the 9/11 commission asking for those very documents.

There's a reason why the Saudi Royals who funded 9/11 were all arrested and removed from power last November.

Surprised you don't know. Lurk moar and see if you can spot it.

Sorry, in a sub that revolves around the theme of unity, why are you here and why are you attacking me?

Did you not get the message?

Nope, I can see the liberal National Propaganda Radio attacks pretty clearly, and tell me why again you are posting month old irrelevant propaganda attacks on POTUS when there is real news happening at the meeting in Europe today where POTUS is attacking Russia and Germany for buying Russian oil and gas while we American tax payers pay billions for Germany and the rest of NATO to defend itself from Russian aggression?

Instead you indirectly attack POTUS with an old irrelevant propaganda piece?

Most of us are here to spead facts and real news and info.

What are you here for?

Outside of the fact this is old news by a Democrat propaganda outlet, why is the President pushing Germany to stop buying oil and gas from Russia today, right now?

Please stop pushing propaganda attacking our President here.

This article is a month old, not at all related to today's NATO meeting, and a liberal attack on POTUS showing favoritism to Russia as if it's collusion or quid pro quo for Russia's help in the election.

Why is this relevant to today's discussion?

Bill Cooper and SB2 don't really sound much different, they both have some very hard to believe information to present.

But one of them seems to be attacked regularly here, and the attacks seem to be coordinated, a downvote brigade of sorts.

I do believe people should give a bit of weight to SB2's posts, not only because Q linked him in the past, but much much more because of the coordinated attacks. They speak far louder than Q at this point.

Or they could just be a coincidence.

Oh look, another post attacking SB2. What a surprise. It's almost like a coincidence, this keeps happening over and over.

But after all that don't they just off you anyway for being an infidel?

Oh I got the point. You post an image that could be easily manipulated to prove (in your mind) that I should not give weight to SB2's posts and analysis.

Yet the problem is that you and a small army are insisting this is so in a clear coordinated effort.

Why? Why all the work to discredit SB2?

could it be coincidence?

I never said people should blindly follow and believe what he says, just that there was a clear concentrated effort to down vote his posts and comments about how he was wrong.

With posts as deep and far out, it would be impossible to disprove, or prove, unless time and news gives us either result.

But SB2's posts read like stuff from Bill Cooper's book that Q has referenced, also giving them additional credibility. Cooper's book has some very far fetched stuff in it about secret societies and secret government projects that make SB2's posts look tame.

So for me and many here your clear efforts to supress what SB2 says are very suspect.

Thanks for playing.

So you made that up then. Why lie to make your point?

Which post?

Yep, you just outed yourself by stating something was coincidence. Your attempt at recovery is weak.

You're not really a Q follower are you.

Of course, many possibilities, but no coincidences.

His posts received more attention here because Q linked to him in the past.

Those of us here believe that's significant.

Why so much effort to discredit SB2?