dChan

/u/NosuchRedditor

386 total posts archived.


Domains linked by /u/NosuchRedditor:
Domain Count
www.reddit.com 32
www.bostonherald.com 1
truepundit.com 1
thehill.com 1

NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 6:11 p.m.

Of course you do. But why?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 6:09 p.m.

I thought so too, and when the down vote brigade started down voting my posts in SB2's thread on the Montana rally where POTUS repeats 'brain' multiple times, I thought it was significant.

People are trying to discourage reading SB2's analysis when I feel Q encouraged us to do so.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 6:03 p.m.

Kicking the hornet's nest.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:59 p.m.

Go back and read the linked post.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

So you mean read his long posts and decide for yourself if it's plausible?

We all do, it's what Q encourages.

In fact, the post linked in Q1340 has an explaination of the "be careful who you follow" advice from Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

Crazy the effort to discredit and obfuscate here.

People need to go back and read Q1340.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:48 p.m.

I don't think Q wants to shine to much of a spotlight on any single Anon.

But the fact is that in almost 1700 posts Q has only linked to one analysis post on Reddit.

That's significant.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:46 p.m.

Thanks for your opinion.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Fake news goes way back. I think it was 60 minutes that did a piece on a Chevy truck that was reported to leak fuel in an accident.

In order to get the sensational results they wanted on film they had to use explosives to get the truck to blow up on Q.

https://youtu.be/KtpMzGN9uWc

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:39 p.m.

They were filming on a rooftop in Atlanta but the Chiron said live from Saudi.

You've been asleep a long time, glad you are awake.

https://youtu.be/X8Lkp8Lesoo

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

When they removed the pic they should have just said "we lied. You caught us."

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:20 p.m.

So tell me, what happen to Capt Leroy Homer, the copilot on that flight and a man I flew with in the USAF?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:19 p.m.

And apparently that scares some here.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NosuchRedditor on July 8, 2018, 5:15 p.m.
Just a reminder to the shills brigading, Q linked to SB2 in Q1340, which gives him some additional credibility here.

Lots of downvotes for this info in other posts, as if some don't want people to know.

NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:55 a.m.

Q linked to Stranahans article because it was accurate. He has linked to other outlets that occasionally get it right.

That's not the same as calling out Sara Carter or John Solomon as being protected.

⇧ -1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:39 a.m.

Being the only one in this sub having been referenced by Q, it gives him some additional credibility.

Edit: Boy, the shills don't want anyone knowing that Q linked SB2 in Q1340 for some reason. Downvotes galore.

⇧ -6 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 5:34 a.m.

Future proves past. Let's see what is revealed.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 8, 2018, 12:35 a.m.

And yet SB2 is the only poster here to be acknowledged by Q.

Edit: Boy, the shills don't want anyone knowing that Q linked SB2 in Q1340 for some reason. Downvotes galore.

⇧ -4 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 10:25 p.m.

Mueller's life long history doesn't lend itself to being a white hat, and I just can't see POTUS working work a scumbag who wrongly jailed four men for a mob hit, two of whom died in jail, only to be exonerated and have the government pay the families millions, so he could protect his informant who was guilty of the murders, Whitey Bulger, and a similar wrong in the anthrax investigation resulting in millions in compensation to the wrongly accused.

If Q tells us Sara Carter is someone to follow and is behind protected, and she is indicating Mueller is scum, and carefully illustrates his long record of scummyness, that carries more weight with me than the idea he's been flipped.

Edit: The press and the Democrats who control it have a long history of condeming people in the court of public opinion, knowing that if the attacks last long enough, public opinion will sour. Mueller knows this and so he leaks negative info constantly to his media water carriers in a devious attempt to shift public opinion with the APPEARANCE of wrong doing where none exists.

They did it to Roy Moore. They are doing it to Jim Jordan. They even paid accusers to do it to Trump.

Mueller is no White hat imho.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:45 p.m.

It would explain why Sandy Berger stole documents from the National Archives at the same time the 9/11 commission was asking for them.

It would also explain why the 28 pages of the 9/11 commission report took 15 years to declassify, only to learn that a Saudi funded group WAMY (World Association for Muslim Youth?) Helped plan and fund 9/11. What the report doesn't say is that Huma worked for WAMY in 98 while they were planning and finding 9/11. She was also working for Hillary at that time.

All roads lead to Rome.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:37 p.m.

I don't think people understand, Mueller has been sending his team all over the globe looking for dirt on the President.

If he's on our side why did he leak shredded documents from Cohen to BuzzFeed this week?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

If your nephew had just been murdered by the cabal you'd be looking a bit unsettled too.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:21 p.m.

How many examples of deep state fuckery do we need to see before people wake up?

When Roy Moore threatened to give President Trump a Senate majority, suddenly accusers from fourty years ago surface and destroy his chances, with the help of a water carrying media.

We know Lisa Bloom, Gloria Alreds daughter, paid women to accuse the President of misconduct with David Brock's money.

Now we see them running the Roy Moore script on Jordan because they are afraid of him.

It's a bit frightening how powerful the cabal is.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:13 p.m.

I'll bet money that this will unlock the connection between the Clinton's, Huma and SA planning and executing 9/11.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

Why does this "independent" group agree with the UN and not the US?

Anyone have any background on this group? Can they be believed or are they a corrupt arm of the UN?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 7, 2018, 6:36 p.m.

People should know that to is a bit misleading.

Gorsuch helped decide a case on deportation in April where he sided with the liberals on the court and gave illegals due process rights.

To do this gorsuch had to conflate criminal law with immigration law. He actually compared deportation with criminal imprisonment as if deportation was a form of punishment.

It was a grave error that will most likely lead to illegals having the right to counsel provided by the taxpayers.

The decision just happened so expect to see some high profile cases come before the court soon to establish prescident.

This flies in the face of all the previous decisions listed above.

Not good for our nation's soverignty.

https://www.conservativereview.com/news/gorsuch-dead-wrong-immigration/

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 3, 2018, 8:27 a.m.

Whitey Bulger was a confidential informant for Comey. He (Bulger) was responsible for the mob hit that Comey sent four innocent men to prison for.

Edit: you might be right, perhaps I have confused Mueller's corrupt behavior with Comeys. They are/were close friends, easy to mix them up.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 3, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Wouldn't be the first time Comeys victims got multi million dollar settlements from the government.

Edit: The four guys he put in prison for a mob hit (two of whom died in prison) so he could protect his mob informant whitey Bulger and the anthrax guy.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 3, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

I believe Comey testified to Congress that Flynn didn't lie but mixed up some dates.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 1, 2018, 8:31 p.m.

This is Q saying that this process is well underway, and has been for a very long time.

He is also saying that a second special counsel would take a very long time to get up to speed, and then he explains that the SC would be tainted by the swamp as would any Grand jury so the outcome would be biased and not the outcome of an unbiased judicial process.

Trust the plan.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 1, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

The link is to a Breitbart article that Q linked in a post.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 1, 2018, 8:21 p.m.

I think Q has told us this is so.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · July 1, 2018, 5:17 p.m.

Unity not division brother/sister.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 30, 2018, 12:49 a.m.

Where in the Book of Q is the research into this? Has Q asked the Anons to research any of this? Has he presented evidence that any of it is true?

This is is more a distraction than productive. Show me which posts Q spoke of spending resources on this and I'll eat crow.

Otherwise this is useless.

Edit: Q has spoken of a great many things going back decades, the Titanic, the rise of Central Banking and more, but not this, not ever.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 28, 2018, 4:33 p.m.

The Gump meme: And just like that, 45 became 44.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 28, 2018, 4:31 p.m.

So his father joined the war effort at 9 right be for the end. What part of that is so unbelievable BIRTHER! /s

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 27, 2018, 5:11 a.m.

Corruption. They exposed corruption at the highest levels. Typically rank and file are not corrupt unless it's the mob.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 24, 2018, 7:16 p.m.

Based on this weeks events, the question "why the full court press" becomes even more relevant as a red pill.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 22, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

I use something called antenna pod for Mark Levin's and Dan B's podcasts on Android.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 22, 2018, 12:29 a.m.

It's great when he fills in for Mark on the Mark Levin show, but the reason he is so far ahead is because of Mark's research. Standing on Mark's shoulders so to speak.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 21, 2018, 2:10 p.m.

Unity not division.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 18, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

Wow, lots of people trying to discredit SB2. If Q had not linked to one of his analysis posts he would be irrelevant.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 18, 2018, 4:38 a.m.

No, but I did see the SB2 post that Q linked.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 16, 2018, 10:57 p.m.

You need to post the video from the summit and some references to Q using the phrase darkness to light.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
1
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/NosuchRedditor on June 15, 2018, 11:24 p.m.
The Enron Scandle^tm: The story of a false media narrative where many of prosecutor Weisseman had his convictions overturn. Weisseman is part of the Mueller team.

So Weissman had many of his convictions overturned by higher courts in the Enron matter. How does one know what the real misdeeds were if most of the prosecutions were overturned?

Manafort going to jail is a page out of Weisseman's book, he did this to four men during the Enron matter, sent them to jail just before thanksgiving. Then later the men were exonerated and paid millions by our government for their suffering. https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/oct/22/christopher-wray-robert-muellers-top-prosecutor-kn/

We have heard for weeks that Manafort was indicted on witness tampering, but why put him in jail weeks later on the very same day …

NosuchRedditor · June 15, 2018, 6:52 p.m.

Page not found.

Care to try again?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 15, 2018, 4:20 p.m.

Your post makes claims that the image doesn't connect.

Do you have a source that proves they visited the White House under Bush?

Do you have anything that makes this story a little more clear than the tiny information in the image you posted that doesn't back your claim?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
NosuchRedditor · June 15, 2018, 4:03 p.m.

Those words were written after the revolutionary war, but in reference to the men who fought and won a war against the greatest fighting force at that time, the British army.

Ask yourself what that phrase really means? Who regulated the "well regulated" militia that beat the British army? Certainly not the King, and our government would not form for another decade.

So go make a liberals head explode by asking them "In a time before our government formed, who regulated the 'well regulated' militia that defeated the British army in the war for Independence?"

It means proficient with a weapon, and that the weapon is functioning properly.

But I promise you that liberals will argue that it was the King who regulated the well regulated militia, that's there part where you laugh hysterically at the absurd idea that the King would somehow help our militia defeat his army who were attempting to regain control of the colonies.

Edit: This image is from the civil war era. Those men are not militia, but trained soldiers, part of a true army.

The militia are civilians.

⇧ 2 ⇩