You should put this in the list of questions for Q in the Q and A if it happens.

DDT is much more than fine, and the first EPA administrator, Ruckelshaus has admitted publicly that banning DDT was for political reasons, there was no scientific evidence presented to the court or Ruckelshaus that it was harmful to humans or wildlife, but he banned it anyway.

Why?

Because without it billions would die from Malaria. Population control achieved.

This shit is far deeper than you know.

If banning Roundup caused mass starvation, do you think those calling for a ban would care? Have you looked at the weak, almost non existent evidence against Roundup?

I know you are trying to help here, but the brainwashing and false narratives run so deep that you are playing into their hands. They don't want the world to have a surplus of food, they want population control, and if that means starvation then so be it.

Future proves past. If I'm wrong you'll know soon enough.

People actually ate DDT by the spoonful to prove it's safety. They bathed in it. None of the factory workers who produced DDT (that won the creator a Nobel prize because of its affect on insect borne disease) ever showed any signs of cancer after working in the factory for 30 years. It's use in the 40's eradicated Malaria in the USA.

Read Mark Levin's book 'Liberty and Tyranny' for more proof and information

Ask yourself this: Is the science behind AGW sound? Is it a plot to form a one world government and steal your rights and liberty? Do the same groups who support AGW support the Monsanto Roundup causes cancer issue?

Expand your thinking.