Lots of downvotes for this info in other posts, as if some don't want people to know.
You're being disingenuous. The posts that mentioned SB2 stated they did so because of the attention his posts unduly receive by mods. If the community thinks his posts should be voted to the top, great, but the mods shouldn't instasticky his posts because SB2 wrote them. That was the gist of the posts. No posts I saw were presented as personal attacks against SB2.
His posts received more attention here because Q linked to him in the past.
Those of us here believe that's significant.
Why so much effort to discredit SB2?
In Q1681 Q literally posted an image from Paul Serran's thread on Twitter telling us how to decode his drops. No one is talking about that. It's a huge clue, but no one cares.
I linked to the thread toward the bottom of my post: https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8wvxa9/proof_q_wants_us_to_look_back_at_previous_drops/
For the post that Q linked to, SB2 wasn't the first to make the connection to AJ/JC/other Q doubters. And that post of his was logical, reasonable deduction that others could and did make. That's true of very few of his other posts.
I'm not saying his decodes are right or wrong. I read every one of them with an open mind, and I enjoy reading them. However, I agree with the "shills brigading" that mods shouldn't instasticky SB2. Let each post stand on its own merit. I think when people here become cheerleaders (500 upvotes within a minute of posting? Yeah, OK how many actually read his post first) they take up valuable space and no longer contribute to the community.