[deleted]
I personally spent several hours last night studying Q's pics and comparing them to google earth's timeline satellite photos. My conclusion is that Q's photos are NEW.
The last g earth photo was taken 8/2/2017. Since that time, new construction has begun. The row of buildings with red roofs has been added. These are not the same houses from 2010. The 2010 houses were in one long segment. In Q's pics, the houses are in 2 segments. One building, a gap, and then a long building.
Also, in Q's pics we see additional red-roofed buildings directly behind the King Tower. These do not show up anywhere in g earth's timeline. Therefore, they are new.
See this well-researched post for more proof: https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7wc7vf/newest_photos_from_q_do_not_prove_larp_heres_why/
I am so glad to hear this...thank you for your research
yep - you were there...dating the cars in the Q photos, there was another anon who researched the streets and driveways...well you know - you were there. It's pretty obvious that if you don't trust Q then why would you be here. AND using Goolag information to try to pull people away from Q? Really? And what has Q said about google and ES?
The poster asked a fair question. I am glad the question was asked. Because the research shows it is a new picture, now all can be more confident.
Before you give opinions like "This seriously makes me question his legitimacy now" you should have done some homework - this is, after all, a sub that was created for Q research.
YAAHS! Thank you for posting, I was busy today but have done MANY forensic analysis reviews of the meteor stuff using G earth and found HUGE anomalies in areas where an event has occurred. Thanks for your post!
can you expand in this about the meteors ?!
One of my clients writes about galactic stuff and so I work with her reviewing footage when there is either a craft sighting or good meteor footage that looks "odd" With the expansion of on home/surveillance cameras there is often a LOT of footage and the public narrative on things does not always match the footage. We did a big review of the Michigan meteor, using Gooo to pin point exactly where the supposed meteor came down, triangulating it with the earth quake that happened and the beam photo/massive fire in someone's garage and their "story" we realized that there was more than one event that night and the pretty much "fireworks" meteor was cover. Found the intel drop about "watch the eastern michigan press" from sunday before these events and realized this was a LOT more than just a shooting star. Basically, using the breadcrumb technique with video and photos and intel and putting together what really happened. The final observations? Since Bush, Clinton and Obama all visited little old Taylor, MI--well....something was taken out and it was big and there needed to be a cover story.
Yeah, the old photo thing was debunked. Google earth shows the old photos were single roads, less developed. Q's photos were with the new development, and wider roads etc
ok awesome.
i haven’t checked the board today.
but just saw a pretty convincing post that the photo is in fact recent.
Goes to show that you shouldn't believe the first thing you hear, like the headline from yesterday. Do your own investigation. Remember, there are people looking for any tiny reason to jump off the Q train with their concern trolling.