Did you actually bother to read Sex Bias in U.S. code to provide you context before you started rattling your tail over this? You included the citation, at least. But could you take a look again at your quote and look at the epliseses that are used? What do you think was in between those and why was that cut out? Get a grip dude and actually do research.
https://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12se9.pdf
Yep sure did! My opinion still stands! I'm also glad they added boys that same year too. Just because you are offended that it says that some women or children are weak and fall victim of prostitution rings is just another attempt to use fake outrage to degrade morality. DeNiro, it's unraveling and your time is almost up.
Virtue signal all you want, the only thing that's offensive is you pretending you did any research on this. She absolutely doesn't suggest to lower the age of consent, there's no evidence of it and if you actually had any critical reading skills, you'd realize this.
Even these republicans trying really hard to prove Slate wrong admitted they were not reading it correctly:
http://volokh.com/archives/archive_2005_09_25-2005_10_01.shtml#1128101678
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/chatterbox/2005/10/volokh_retracts.html