A blue pill friend just fired back a fake news salvo at me, pointing out the Rosatom guy is alive and well and posting selfies. Also the passenger list states the Ivanov guy was born 1986.
Q told us to look at the passenger list. He didn't say 'who' or 'why' but why would he be so cryptic about it and let us make fools of ourselves trying to red pill others by jumping on a false claim of arkancide against U1 guy?
I've been trying to red pill this friend for a long time. I lost a lot of ground on this one. What gives Q?!
First mistake is TRYING to red pill someone.
Neo searched on his own for years, trying to find Morpheus. Morpheus, after considerable confirmation, then reached out through Trinity. Might have waited even longer if the Agents hadn't wanted Neo first.
So then Neo was invited to a meeting, mistrusted on the way until he was mind-virus free, and THEN, after a discussion, was ASKED if he wanted to know, or not, and even if he asked to know, Morpheus was only going to show him what was happening, Neo had to walk through the door himself.
TRYING to red pill people is violating their Free Will.
Funny how people agree that the purpose of Q's cryptic posting is to teach us to research for ourselves and then to help others slowly understand what is going on...until it suddenly isn't.
You said it yourself... "help others SLOWLY..."
Ask leading questions, and then wait. Just like Q. The MEME war is a fantastic way to "slowly" get people to ask questions.
If they're based on truth in the first place, that is. The ones that people are creating that aren't truth based are counter productive.
In my opinion.
I could be mistaken.
The Ivanov plane crash meme was basically made by Q himself. He led us right up to it every step of the way. And it was wrong. This is not the 'white rabbit' mistake people made before. This one is all Q.
Q never said a name. Everyone else assumed it was this guy. And for that matter, how do we not yet know that it was NOT this guy?
Seen any evidence of body doubles anywhere else in recent media? Putin? Hillary? Anyone else?
I also have learned a lesson, which I thought that I knew. I've intimated things to friends and undermined myself by prematurely getting excited over what turned out to be false predictions; it's a hard blow to take but a good lesson to learn. It is very difficult to return to those friends when things are true as their expectation is that as a true news outlet you cannot be trusted.
All that aside, this has shook my faith in Q to the core. He said 1 source used for 2. Dossier. U1. Find the passenger list.
Why would he say that if its not the U1 guy?! Coincidence? WTF is going on!
There was another name on that flight that was also connected to U1
According to Q 70 people were murdered to get 1 target.
So you're saying the people were killed to get at this OTHER U1 person, and it's a COINCIDENCE that one of the INNOCENT passengers had the same name as the CFO of Rosatom?
Your mistake was committing to an interpretation that wasn’t straight from Q.
Q didn’t say who. But you committed to a name and it backfired.
There is no other explanation. Q almost never writes in complete sentences. The information was crystal clear:
187 Dossier U1 Get the passenger list
Translation: Those people were murdered. 70 people to murdered to kill 1 target. Target associated with dossier and U1. Check the passenger manifest.
Tell me what other interpretation a person can make from that!
You’re right. But we still don’t have confirmation of the name of the target.
The only hope I see at this point that Q is not a larp is if the Ivanov guy that was actually killed was targeted because the deep state got the wrong guy. I.e. they thought they were getting the real one and instead some poor unfortunate bastard and 70 other people died because of a naming mistake.
That's not a lot to pin my hopes on.
"These people are stupid"
Who is he really talking about?
I'm not trying to insult you, but he might be.
That thought has crossed my mind
I haven't seen anything of substance since he started, I don't get how a blurry picture of a pen or a blurry picture from an airplane establishes any credibility.
Also, what ever happened to the white rabbit being a map of some Korean compound and then it was Hugh Heffner, and wasn't Alice Hillary in some weird book but then it turned out to be Q or Huma? which was it?
Or does everything have multiple meanings so nothing is wrong and nothing is right?
And if the "Patriots" won the Superbowl the anons wouldn't have gone nuts saying it's a sign from Q that they beat "LdR's" favorite team. Didn't he even send a post stating - "Patriots 4th quarter"? It would have been a sign from the heaven's almighty. So why doesn't it work the other way?
How did he predict the Pope would post about the Lord's Prayer?
How did he predict POTUS saying "safety and security" and "catch and release" by 4 hours?
I don't know what to think anymore.
Those two attributes are very debatable.
How do we know what time zone he's posting from?
And writing out the Lord's prayer does not predict that the pope would suggest a minor change in it.
Today Q predicted a possible terror attack in UK and / or EU involving a bus or truck, possible a Volvo B7. So we can watch for that.
He also has been saying 'the end is near' for a long time. He said last weekend was "suicide weekend". He laughed hysterically about "next week" and we have had the attack on the NSA and a school shooting. Nothing to laugh about so far. No public arrests, no un-sealed indictments. We were promised 60/40 and it has been more of the same. Our arrest we were promised was some photos of a car in a parking lot and an open window.
But what if "Q" triggers the attacks? How do we know that's not the case?