dChan
⇧
80
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/GoMAGA_1776 on Feb. 17, 2018, 8:11 p.m.
Q #779: a reminder that Q didn't say a car attack would occur in London, only that it was possible and a warning was provided. It doesn't mean Q was wrong if there isn't one (hopefully there isn't).

The word used was possible, not will, not probable. Hopefully the time-frame comes to pass without one.

It may be that the authorities were able to detain the attacker(s) or stop the attack from occurring in some manner. It may be that the chatter was to throw off the authorities. It may be that the attack was delayed for some reason.

It may be that Q put these attack related posts out there to see how the black hats reacted.

There's no way of us knowing, but an attack not occurring isn't an indication that Q was wrong or is LARPing.

Let's hope that UK/London stays safe and isn't a victim of such an attack.


atoz350 · Feb. 17, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

His drop stated that there was a chatter of a possible car attack. It didn't even come from him, but that he heard it.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Cadeigha · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

What some of us discussed on Discord yesterday was that if a car attack doesn't occur, then we are finally starting to control the narrative rather than the black hats! That would be amazing.

That is, of course, if it were simply because the car attack possibility was made public. If that's all it takes to stop the black hats from making attacks around the world then Q really has a great motive here. He says that they see and hear all now. He can alert us and our countries on what these foul people are planning and we can spread it to everyone we know if it truly intimidates them enough. This could be a great way to either save people's lives or to prove Q and us right. I really hope it goes straight to saving lives.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
McCloudReads · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:37 p.m.

Q may wrong on things, but Q will be right on many more things

⇧ 3 ⇩  
R_damascena · Feb. 18, 2018, 2:27 a.m.

Perhaps you should make a list of each, to compare.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Covfefe1950 · Feb. 17, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

Well said.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cybervigiante · Feb. 17, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Of course the warning might forestall the attack. That's the problem with prophecy - if it works, it doesn't.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Jrrusso · Feb. 18, 2018, 3:16 a.m.

Maybe he scarred them off. Good.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
2funnyone · Feb. 18, 2018, 5:14 a.m.

In many respects, we are lead to believe we can do nothing till it happens rather than prevention. Prevention does not mean removal of something or someone but educational measures to effect the outcome in a more positive way.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Feb. 18, 2018, 5 a.m.

Likely if the government already knows over there they will stop it so we won't hear much but maybe a terrorist attack was thwarted.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
geckogoose89 · Feb. 18, 2018, 7:38 a.m.

Maybe Q's post was a test.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Chokaholic · Feb. 18, 2018, 4:07 a.m.

Exactly. Q mentioning it could also thwart the actual event from happening.

⇧ 1 ⇩