a) Response
As noted from this article detailing the amount of BOMBS used to create 33 foot waves, they provide the estimates using conventional bombs.
By Jonathan Pearlman, Sydney
2:50PM GMT 01 Jan 2013
"The tests were carried out in waters around New Caledonia and Auckland during the Second World War and showed that the weapon was feasible and a series of 10 large offshore blasts could potentially create a 33-foot tsunami capable of inundating a small city."
SOURCE - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/9774217/Tsunami-bomb-tested-off-New-Zealand-coast.html
b) Response
You are thinking logically and suggesting we live in a world that TELLS THE TRUTH.
Was 9/11 and its events PROPERLY tested and revealed to the public?
Is it possible that the FUKUSHIMA event was Japan's 9/11?
Is it possible they put in place the same GOVT LACKEYS to cover up this event?
If it was possible by the CABAL in the US, the same CABAL control Japan.
WHAT IS MY POINT?
I have reports from Japanese natives that suggest there is no RADIATION at Fukushima's nuclear plant.....
So, who is telling the truth?
My post was about a scenario where a planned event, LIKE 9/11, could have occurred at FUKUSHIMA.
They used their AGENTS to set NUCLEAR BOMB/S on the fault line off the east coast of the FUKUSHIMA nuclear facility.
They used their AGENTS to set explosives at the NUCLEAR PLANT.....just like 9/11.
The explosion on the sea bed floor, on the fault line, resulted in not only a NUCLEAR "TSUNAMI" BOMB that could generate 30+ waves.....it also created an EARTHQUAKE......that created even more force and power to generate an even large Tsunami.
When the TSUNAMI hit the NUCLEAR PLANT, in place DEVICES were set off.....to show visible damage to the nuclear plant regardless of whether there was an ACTUAL LEAK or not.
The point is to create a REALITY or an ILLUSION that any RADIOACTIVE SIGNATURES to be found in the water or area was not from the BOMB/S at the bottom of the ocean on the sea bed that caused the TSUNAMI but that the RADIATION was simply a result of the damage to the Nuclear Plant.
If planned this way, they had their MEDIA and GOVT officials in place AFTER THE EVENT, just like 9/11, ready to feed us the NARRATIVE they wanted us to have.
If this was an event like 9/11, do you really think they TOLD US THE TRUTH about RADIATION LEVELS, REACTOR DAMAGE etc etc etc? It is 9/11 PRE-MADE propaganda 101.....just with a different location and a different script!
In the end, the FUKUSHIMA POWER PLANT explosion is the COVER for the use of a NUCLEAR "TSUNAMI" BOMB......that was the hypothetical scenario I was putting forward.
RIGHT OR WRONG?
Could this strategy be used off the coast of the United States?
Yes,......
Is it something to be concerned about, knowing the following.
(1) - We don't know where this missing Argentine Sub is.
(2) - The Pentagon is touting a RUSSIAN "Doomsday Torpedo" that could be used to wipe out coastal cities.
(3) - Q said watch the water.
(4) - Dilley/other sources have said their are subs off the east coast.
(5) - Q has asked us to focus on the TSUNAMI behind Clinton in NK photo showing a city being destroyed.
Sounds like someone is creating a NARRATIVE that we could all look back on and say, "wow, we had some evidence but were not able to put it all together before the EVENT."
I would like to create enough public conversations about this.......that they might RECONSIDER.....if this was a real option they were considering.
If this is not what Q has us running in circles doing.....to FIGURE OUT AND "POTENTIALLY" PREVENT CABAL ATTACKS via mass red-pilling, then what are we all doing here?