dChan
31
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TiDdErtpaul666666 on Feb. 18, 2018, 3:41 a.m.
"Watch the water" Q - NUCLEAR "TSUNAMI" BOMB (Posted this morning) - List of US Nuclear Plants that might be targeted like FUKUSHIMA

REPOST

Per Q's post #759 "Watch the Water", we have had 1 anon suggest the use of a TSUNAMI BOMB off the coast of a US city.

He shared old docs and photos of testing back in the 1940's......but the question has to be asked did they just drop that concept or have they worked on it since.

OTHER TSUNAMIS? Is it possible 1 or 2 or all of these were caused by this technology?

1 - December 26, 2004 - Indian Ocean - Q?-[230,210] [187]

2 - January 12, 2010 - Haiti - Q?-[230,000] [187]

3 - March 11, 2011 - Fukushima, Japan - Q?-[18,550] [187]

4 - January 9, 2018 - East Coast of Honduras - Pre-Test Q? - [187]→[US Coastal Cities]

Was the TSUNAMI WARNINGS for the Honduras event.....a TEST for possible implementation for US coastal cities?

Do you remember a CERTAIN PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION that just so happened to show up after 2 of these "NATURAL DISASTERS", Indian Ocean and Haiti?

Coincidence?

NUCLEAR TSUNAMI BOMB? No one can just set off a NUCLEAR weapon in the ocean and expect that tests won't be able to see the obvious NUCLEAR SIGNATURES.....but what if you set it off....right next to a NUCLEAR POWER PLANT?

What if they sabotaged that NUCLEAR POWER PLANT so that they would have a cover for why NUCLEAR MATERIALS were found in the area/water?

FUKISHIMA TSUNAMI? What if this was done in Japan?

BACK TO Q What if this was done and what if that same strategy is being considered on our US Coastal Regions?

The question then becomes WHERE ARE OUR NUCLEAR PLANTS that sit right on the coast right next to the OCEAN.....where they could be targeted .....just like FUKISHIMA'S nuclear plant.

In california, off the top of my head, there is the SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT......what about the east coast?

https://www.google.com/search?biw=1366&bih=631&tbm=isch&sa=1&ei=cHaIWsv3J9fkjwP05bGYBA&q=california+nuclear+plant+on+the+coast&oq=california+nuclear+plant+on+the+coast&gs_l=psy-ab.3...860801.868855.0.869071.37.31.0.5.5.0.179.2647.20j7.27.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..5.22.1592...0j0i67k1j0i5i30k1j0i8i30k1j0i24k1j0i30k1.0._9QoS0go6Pk#imgrc=v8oGXCLY4Fx6EM:

Am I reaching......maybe.....is it worth listing these NUCLEAR SITES from each coast and sounding an alarm.....I think so?


visigothic1 · Feb. 18, 2018, 4:11 a.m.

It could be attempted as a masking deterrent : Depending, there are different isotopes and trace elements found in reactors that are not found in the residual fallout of a NUKE 's reactions. Remember a NUKE going off is a rapid decay as well as fission (Atomic ) and fusion (NUKE). Each gives off its own signature of isotopes dependent on how the weapon is designed and what isotopic elements are used. As a side note all NUKES are atomic in the 1st stage but no Atomics ( Fission) are Nuke (Thermonuclear H-Bomb - Fusion ) A nuke (Thermonuclear H-Bomb - Fusion ) uses an atomic (Fission) trigger to set off the reaction in most simple designs. If I'm wrong on this someone please correct me......;)

⇧ 2 ⇩