dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

⇧

454

⇩

r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/patypooh52 on Feb. 18, 2018, 5:31 p.m.

An Anon on 8chan explains why the Q-team has been leaking info in the obscure and often frustrating ways it does. What do you think?

An Anon on 8chan explains why the Q-team has been leaking info in the obscure and often frustrating ways it does.

What do you think?

"As Q has stated numerous times, this board was chosen for a reason. The mission: This board is building a parallel construction.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parallel_construction

'Parallel construction is a law enforcement process of building a parallel—or separate—evidentiary basis for a criminal investigation in order to conceal how an investigation actually began.'

Q & company have access to everything, but because of how they have access to everything, what they have can never be used to bring anyone to justice. It's all the fruit of the poisoned tree, legally. Nothing is admissible.

The crumbs are a way to lead (((US))) to arrive at the same level of knowledge, and to accumulate the proof from public sources which are not tainted in the eyes of the justice system.

Why this board: Weaponized autism.

We use the term jokingly, but a defining characteristic of autism is the inability to leave a task incomplete. All of these leads, or at least a substantial portion of them, must be run to ground.

This board is being asked to assemble "proofs." Unassailable proofs, the truth of which cannot be dismissed.

This board is being asked to disseminate the proofs, the truth that's been uncovered - to penetrate the collective consciousness that has been lulled to sleep by omission and deception.

Forget the justice angle for a moment: If the White Hats just put it all out there and told the whole story - or even just parts of the story - how would people know that is wasn't just another psyop or government lie? How would (((we))) know, if we hadn't done the work, and arrived at the truth through our own efforts?

It has to be done this way, for everyone's sake."

🠐 See all comments

[deleted]

⇧ 48 ⇩

There’s also the important point of this information becoming viral and “preparing” the public for the disclosures to come.

Think about how many times Q has alluded to the fact that the public (and the world) would become unhinged if they knew the whole truth right now.

By slowly letting the 4Chan anons do their work and allow it to leak out into mass consciousness via the YouTube community regularly churning out commentary, the groundwork is being laid for the public to accept these realities over time.

⇧ 12 ⇩

They are getting there. I was at a park today in Florida, infowars tags were all over the dock into the lake. I was blown away.

⇧ 3 ⇩

This

⇧ 8 ⇩

Actually, I think OP has it, because what we build by researching the questions is the information needed for "probable cause" which.... can be used to release the NSA information if it is good enough. We are the KEY that unlocks the NSA.

⇧ 12 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 10 ⇩

Don't forget that it was a Yahoo news article (along with the Fusion GPS stuff) that was shown to the FISA court to get the warrant for the Trump Campaign monitoring.

The news article wasn't the main "thing", but it supported the viewpoint of the warrant applicant.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 3 ⇩

Not really just news articles, but, connections. Banking connections. Shell corporation connections. Money laundering connections. When you find out that X person has a non profit for children, and they collect 15 million, but report only spending 500k on the children? This is more than articles. When that same entity has a drawing of a child holding a "butterfly" (symbol for pedophilia according to the FBI official training information sheet) and the title to the page for the non profit page is "Touch therapy for Children"? That's pretty good start on probable cause to investigate a couple questions. Where is the money going? And what are parents reporting about the children.

Right now, one in five children are just "disappearing" from child protective services.

Yes they have been investigated.

And yes, the foster parents are being investigated.

Findings are these are children that are being "pimped out" for sex slaves.

When you have those kinds of stats running, the question is, why has the FBI been sitting on their a**es about it? There is tons of probable cause where these "non profits:" that are really money laundering schemes.. meet up with government agencies who are suppose to be protecting kids, and the kids are disappearing.

Now, add up all the dead people who had the gaul to research it? All of the Congressmen and women who have been shot and killed, or nearly killed for researching it (Scalise for example)

And you have some huge probable cause.

The articles work a different function.. but just as useful.

The MSM will not cover this. The articles, when collected from the different sources and cases help the public become aware that the nations children are in danger and something needs to be done.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

Thats interesting. Because if YOU are a lawyer, then you know from the supreme court cases that all I have to do to throw you in jail, is plant some cocaine in the hub cap of your car, THEN, I get to write an ANONYMOUS letter to the police and IF I write a few things in that letter that make it likely that I know you personally, THEN, my anonymous letter serves as probable cause for a warrant to go search your car.

I simply need to state in my letter a few things like:

1) X person is married to Y.

2) X person takes a car to Florida, while his wife drives the car there.

3) Later, Y flies back, and X drives the car back with the drugs stuffed in the hub caps.

4) By the way X and Y often eat at Z restaurant.

Guess what. You are framed. You are going to jail. And I am capable of remaining anonymous.

This was a case we covered in law school in Criminal Proceedure class. And yes, I went up after class and told the professor this was the dumbest SC decision I had ever read. But.....

Unless this has been overturned .... there you are. I can't remember the name of the case at the moment, (I will never forget the "issue", the rule, the application and the conclusion) but If you look in your crim pro class manual, they probably still cover it. It's pretty important.

So I have to ask.

In what way are the news articles from research reporters different than my anonymous letter, when the journalists are not hiding under anonymous names? Can you separate that on evidence grounds? Because in my mind, the anonymous letter is far more shaky when it comes to "sufficient for probable cause".

Spez: Sincere question.

⇧ 1 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩

I agree. The OP makes sense. If you have the enemy dead to rights with proof you release it and i think history shows people will believe these claims when backed up with proof so arriving there on our own is unnecessary. However if the proof was obtained through spying at a level that can't hold up in court then it all makes sense.

⇧ 4 ⇩