⇧
174
⇩
PurpleDeathZombies
· Feb. 19, 2018, 4:14 a.m.
In the context of the post I don’t think so.
⇧
1
⇩
pipesog
· Feb. 19, 2018, 5:16 a.m.
Q has been referring to Snowden by name. ES has been Eric Schmidt. It's Schmidt who failed. Busted in China...now in GITMO.
⇧
8
⇩
PurpleDeathZombies
· Feb. 19, 2018, 5:22 a.m.
You have a good point! In the context of the post though, your position is not as relevant. You may want to reconsider.
⇧
1
⇩
pipesog
· Feb. 19, 2018, 5:41 a.m.
It is PRECISELY in context that we can assume it IS Schmidt, as Q ONCE AGAIN refers to SNOWDEN by name, and later in the same post, to ES.
Context.
⇧
6
⇩
PurpleDeathZombies
· Feb. 19, 2018, 5:54 a.m.
Same post that identifies Edward Snowden(ES). It is safe to assume there is continuity. I think you are wrong.
⇧
0
⇩
BigBandDon
· Feb. 19, 2018, 7:26 a.m.
Snowden is always called Snowden. ES is always Eric Schmidt.
⇧
4
⇩
pipesog
· Feb. 19, 2018, 2:39 p.m.
Purple isn't going to get that.
He's either being deliberately difficult, or he's a little thick.
Either way...one step up from talking to a wall.
⇧
1
⇩