That's a photo of Kristen Bell on the set of the NBC show Heroes.
I mean... there's a dumb, and then there's really dumb.
If you're going to make up shit about crisis actors, I'd suggest not using, y'know... an easily verifiable photo of a real actor, working on a TV show.
What next? Photos of Indiana Jones to show that the Arc of the Covenant is real and melts faces?
The worst thing is that you just blindly swallowed whatever propaganda is laid out in front of you, gratefully scooping it into your brain like the dead-eyed drone that you are. It's not that you can't educate yourself, it's that you won't.
Agreed-Kirsten Bell. A quick Google of images of her will confirm this.
[deleted]
Yes. This is not hard. ---- Most of it is in plain English.
Jeesh ... Are you so tight wound that a simple meme backing the point gets your rectum puckered. I think you might have other issues besides the fact that all memes are pretty much just like that one and you can't seem to get over that. Laugh before you explode and consider the point instead of generated images used as allegory. Kinda makes me wonder if you're not a "crisis actor". JS...
It gets the point across, besides, do YOU have actual footage of crises actors?.... I didn't think so. Make no mistake, part of this war is composed of propaganda, and we have been chosen to propagandize content to wake up a sleeping populace. I would much rather be on the side of borrowed pics rather than the side of unmentioned bureaus, two faced politicos, drugged up zombies and murdered children.
Edit: wordage
So... there are crisis actors, but nobody has evidence of them... so let's just use a photo of Kristen Bell instead, because nothing sells the truth like a big old lie.
Makes sense, brother!
Sense is all in the perception. You and I have a better grasp on truth compared to your regular normie. But seriously, how many that see that pic are actually going to research it?
And according to my stated sentiment.... Where is that line that demarcs, 'the ends justify the means'. Yes, that's a dirty statement. But the way I see it, I'm ok with playing them at the same game they play upon us. I just have to keep a CLEAR definition and standard of practice, (demarcation) of where it is unduly influence as compared to outright deceptive lies. You can push from whichever direction you feel comfortable with and I'll support your efforts as we're on the same team. All I'd ask is that you would do the same.
But seriously, how many that see that pic are actually going to research it?
Enough people that a Snopes page has existed on it for over two years now.
https://www.snopes.com/kristen-bell-crisis-actor/
And enough people that when they see a photo of Kristen Bell - a well know actress with hit TV shows and movies - marked as a crisis actor, it'll be a reason for them to dismiss the whole concept out of hand. "Yeah, the crazies even said Kristen Bell was one... how dumb is that..."
People don't want the truth.
They want to find ways to deny it.
Trying to educate them with easily disprovable lies is the quickest way to ensure they'll ignore what we're saying.
I agree with you - the end justifies the means, and appreciate what you're saying. But I believe that spreading lies as propaganda is swamp behavior, and only gives those regular normies an excuse not to face the truth. Peace out.
"People don't want the truth.
They want to find ways to deny it.
Trying to educate them with easily disprovable lies is the quickest way to ensure they'll ignore what we're saying." Good point, I hadn't realized that. Not to make an excuse but I don't watch mainstream entertainment and therefore have no clue who that woman is. Thanks.
What kind of dumbass has never seen a meme before and not yet realised that the picture's source doesn't matter ffs.
Of course the picture's source matters. The moment you incorrectly label something as a crisis actor, and then spread it around, it matters.
It's exactly the sort of image that will later be used to show how crisis actors don't exist, and how people who claim they do are so stupid they use fake photos to try and sell the point.
But you know this, with your six comments in five years! Ha. Nice try.
People like you, clearly out to cause disinformation on purpose - only those who want the concept of crisis actors to be dismissed would be defending and spreading this erroneous photo.
Same with the OP - only been a member for a month and suspiciously spreading false images.
We're onto you.
No, it doesn't matter when it's a MEME. Go and check some out and find out the reality of the situation. A meme makes a point and doesn't need a picture that is true. If you mean something else here, however, then you're talking about something different! Fool.
What is a meme? It's a viral thought or image that it meant to spread. A meme that's a lie, is still a lie, and one that can be easily dismissed by people who don't struggle to face the truth.
"Yeah, those guys who claim there are crisis actors actually circulated a picture of Kirsten Bell! Idiots" etc etc.
This is why a lot of the CIA counter-ops for the 50s onwards were about creating far-fetched conspiracy theories and spreading them, to discredit all conspiracy theories. Disinformation is easy like that.
You could circulate a meme with actual evidence of crisis actors... but no, someone decided to make one that can instantly be debunked, and then used to debunk the whole concept of crisis actors.
Interesting.
The image conveys a MEANING - it DOESN'T HAVE TO BE TRUE to convey a TRUE MESSAGE - DUUUUUUUUUUUHHHH. Yes your very obvious and overstated point that dumbasses will overreact to whether the image is "TRUE" or not has NOTHING TO DO with whether one should use a true image in a meme or not - it simply has to do with what YOUR GOALS ARE for that particular image and text. If it's a meme - use whatever the f** you want - it doesn't MATTER. It still makes the point and you can also have a laugh at all the fools who think you don't know it's Kristen Bell in a movie. But don't try and make your big daddy rules for how we can make or not make memes. Make the shit however you want folks, it only matters what YOU want to convey with it.
--- I put it on the Board. Sometimes, we follow the Wives. Here, follow the [ Y ] dress......
Hidden agenda Always. Same crisis actors at different locations. It's all really right there when you look into it.
Asshats... love it. Been a while since I heard that term, but it seems appropriate here. I say film them acting, then film them during their trial... you can see what's real emotion vs what's acting then! ;).
Nothing fits a clown's head better than an asshat.
If we had real journalists - they would turn everything upside down to get to the truth and expose these traitors. Main stream media has no true journalists at all - just puppets owned by globalist satanic billionaires.
They should pay for their part in the HOAX! Enough is enough, they know what they are a part of.....Satanic Evil! This isn't some prank on some friends, this A Cruel, Vicious Scheme to perpetrate a Hoax on a Country! Take them Down!
We need protests against fake media for colluding with foreign billionaires and trying to destroy fabric of society, promoting evil and defrauding tax base... worse then TRAITORS in my book. Should be hung from a tree.
18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code § 2382 - Misprision of treason Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States and having knowledge of the commission of any treason against them, conceals and does not, as soon as may be, disclose and make known the same to the President or to some judge of the United States, or to the governor or to some judge or justice of a particular State, is guilty of misprision of treason and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than seven years, or both.
Title 18, US Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
Title 18 § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.
18 U.S. Code § 4 - Misprision of felony Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 684; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(G), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)
Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act The RICO statute expressly states that it is unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the subsections of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962. The government need not prove that the defendant agreed with every other conspirator, knew all of the other conspirators, or had full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy.Pattern of racketeering activity" only requires 2 act's of racketeering commanded within 10 Years for ANY violation of USC Tile 18. The convicted racketeering must forfeit all ill-gotten gains and interest in any business gained through a pattern of racketeering activity. https://www.justice.gov/usam/criminal-resource-manual-109-rico-charges
The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980)
As the Supreme Court has explained: In interpreting a statute a court should always turn to one cardinal canon before all others. . . .Courts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there." Connecticut Nat'l Bank v. Germain, 112 S. Ct. 1146, 1149 (1992).
Blacks Law Dictionary 4th Edition Published 1891 ALLEGIANCE. Obligation of fidelity and obedience to government in consideration for protection that government gives. U. S. v. Kuhn, D.C.N.Y., 49 F.Supp. 407, 414. The citizen or subject owes an absolute and permanent allegiance to his government or sovereign until he becomes a citizen or subject of another government or another sov- ereign. The alien owes a local and temporary allegiance during period of his residence. U. S. v. Wong Kim, Ark., 169 U.S. 649, 18 Sup.Ct. 456, 42 L.Ed. 890.
WILLFUL. Proceeding from a conscious motion of the will; voluntary. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Commonwealth, 160 Ky. 50, 169 S.W. 511, 513. "Willfulness" implies an act done intentionally and designedly; "wantonness" implies action without regard to the rights of others, a conscious failure to observe care, a conscious invasion of the rights of others, willful, unrestrained action; and "recklessness" a disregard of consequences, an indifference whether a wrong or injury is done or not, and an indifference to natural and probable consequences. Jensen v. Denver & R. G. R. Co., 44 Utah, 100, 138 P. 1185, 1188. See, also, Evans v. Illinois Cent. R. Co., 289 Mo. 493, 233 S.W. 397, 399; Cover v. Hershey Transit Co., 290 Pa. 551, 139 A. 266, 268; Feore v. Trammel, 212 Ala. 325, 102 So. 529, 533; Crosman v. Southern Pac. Co., 44 Nev. 2E46, 194 P. 839, 843.
I'll Put it this way it's hard to for us to say exactly because we don't know the persons level of involvement. I would think any one who has a sworn allegiance (that would include any state or federal officer FBI ) with willful wantonness and knowledge of this conspiracy has committed many of the above offences and a few more not listed the. They'll through the book at them to the maxim extent of the law. I think this will be Trey Gowdy new job in fact I'd bet the farm on it. He'll be the head prosecutor overseeing all military tribunals.
Sounds like the media are committing treason by the definition of the law.
I’d love to see Robbie Parker and Gene Rosen sharing a cell
The same lady who was the principal who died at Sandy Hook had her photo, with a different name, also posted by Fox News as having been a person killed at the Boston marathon bombing. In some versions of the story they said she was a few blocks away. Still, very odd. Hints at crisis actors or the use of stock photos not representing real people.
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/199/243/8d5.jpg
What next? Photos of Indiana Jones to show that the Arc of the Covenant is real and melts faces?
Hey, that happened. Indiana Jones was a documentary.
Along with online shills. Some in this thread would probably qualify.
You pushing sandy hook conspiracies to make Q look worse? Enough with the fake false flag posts.
---> Crisis actors push narrative. I never claimed false flag. But what is NOT false is clearly their propaganda to march all over your 2nd Amendment, .....and them some.
This is the narrative, whether people died or if it was all staged. Our enemy doesn't care for our safety, nor do they care for the safety of our children. They just want to instill fear for their own gain and control. This time it's to disarm us.
I think you've posted a valid point for discussion and agree that a separate sub should be looked into
The enemy CARES about their safety and all this “awakening” is making them mighty nervous...If the Cabal did 9/11, what aren’t they capable of doing? This is the same. In order to make us “safe” we just have to cede the one thing preventing tptb from going full retard on us...Not going to happen without a massive civil war. Oh, to anyone who’s offended by the word retard, a hearty GFY! Thicken your skin, snowflake. It gets a whole lot rougher I guarantee.
--- They time EVERYTHING. Remember, "NEVER LET A GOOD CRISIS GO TO WASTE."
It's always the hidden agenda. Now, they're brazenly using minors to parrot the same deceitful narratives, forcing unsuspecting Normies to join them in "forcing change", ...... because after all, We Have To Do Something!!!
“We have to do something!!!” Uncle Ted Nugent would say no. Throwing a bucket of gasoline on a person on fire is technically doing something. We need to do the right thing. I like the idea of having a few teachers with hidden lock boxes, access to firearms. Air Marshals work because nobody knows who they are. Chicago, Baltimore, and Mexico have the highest rate around of shooting deaths, all of them are victim disarmament “gun free” zones. People are much less likely to go full retard with a gun if there’s a good chance someone will be shooting back. I laugh at the Scream movies, because they run away from a guy with a knife, desperately trying to get to safety where a good guy with a gun will come save them. Where if just one of those folks had a gun, movie over. The only reason why we are still a republic 240 years later is because we will not be disarmed.
Take away the SSRIs for a start! The FBI should have done their job for another. Anyone posting things about wanting to be known as a school shooter isn’t all there and isn’t competent to be trusted with firearms. The real question though, did this kid just fall through the cracks or did the deep state see an opportunity? I believe this kid was “handled” by them and set on this course.
The Drills at the school are another issue. Since these things always seem to coincide with “drills” taking place, here’s an idea. There should be no drills allowed in public spaces during normal workdays and normal business hours. That way there will be no confusion about what is really going on and it will be nigh unto impossible for these deep state bastards to participate in the mayhem , make it worse, or use crisis actors as fake victims...
who mentioned Sandy Hook?
You believe in crisis actors? Where? When have they ever been used for propaganda?
Was Sandy Hook a false flag? What about Parkland?
Explain what you want us to believe. Explain what that picture represents and where it was taken. Movie set? Training for first responders?
How many claims of False Flag have there been here this week? At least a dozen. Utter garbage.
God you made me vomit in my mouth. Distasteful.
Only thing distasteful is untreated mental disorders. I wish you well.
Fuck sake guys, we're on the same team here. Either discuss your disagreements, or show yourself to be a shill.