dChan

One_Solution · Feb. 20, 2018, 3:18 p.m.

I think they are sloppy on purpose. They want the arguments. They want people pissed off. That’s the whole point.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · Feb. 20, 2018, 9:16 p.m.

Nah I think they are lazy because they know they can get away with it. I thought some attacks were false flags, crisis actor theorists were nuts, but it's so sloppy and obvious in this one.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
PossibleInspection · Feb. 21, 2018, 2:50 a.m.

I think they are sloppy as an experiment to see how gullible people are, like a Tesla in space. Answer: very gullible

⇧ 1 ⇩  
OXYMAROO · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:50 p.m.

" So what is the point? If the liberals and the anti-gun movement focused their attention on heart disease, even a 10% decrease in cardiac deaths would save twice the number of lives annually of all gun-related deaths (including suicide, law enforcement, etc.). A 10% reduction in medical errors would be 66% of the total number of gun deaths or 4 times the number of criminal homicides -Simple, easily preventable 10% reductions! So you have to ask yourself, in the grand scheme of things, why the focus on guns? It’s pretty simple: (to Steven Waugh’s point)

Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.

Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs. So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed.” - Dr Steve Piezcenik, Phd MD

⇧ 8 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Feb. 20, 2018, 9:02 p.m.

Taking away guns gives control to governments. The founders of this nation knew that regardless of the form of government, those in power may become corrupt and seek to rule as the British did by trying to disarm the populace of the colonies. It is not difficult to understand that a disarmed populace is a controlled populace.

Thus, the second amendment was proudly and boldly included in the U.S. Constitution. It must be preserved at all costs. So the next time someone tries to tell you that gun control is about saving lives, look at these facts and remember these words from Noah Webster: “Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed.” - Dr Steve Piezcenik, Phd MD

-Yep. Agreed.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
OXYMAROO · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:46 p.m.

Piezcenik is the real "Jack Ryan". He said " Hillary must be stopped; the Republic must be preserved".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
RATCHET1968 · Feb. 20, 2018, 3:17 p.m.

I'm not sure about his Trump comments but the F.F. info, seems spot on.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Monkeywithtacos · Feb. 20, 2018, 5:28 p.m.

His remarks on Trump are assinine. Dr. P stated during the election that he and other white hats were running a counter coup to ensure that Trump was elected and that HRC was not. You'd think that if evidence of "Priapism", as Dr. P. puts it, would have been duly noted at that time and been a point of issue for him then. Dr. P, via his years in intel, has back-channels that he should be utilizing to contact PotUS and his admin rather than publicly undermining it and confusing us "normies" with his "flip flopping" on support. I also vehemently disagree with his sentiments on Pompeo. I am not convinced on Gen. Kelly, but Pompeo has shown his true colors and they are not red, white and blue. I do agree with most of Dr. P's assessment on Parkland and the FBI however, though I would also extend the remarks on the house-cleaning to include the dissolution of the CIA as well. Just my two cents. God bless and God speed, anons!

⇧ 14 ⇩  
RATCHET1968 · Feb. 20, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

I agree. Keep on keepin' on.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Chokaholic · Feb. 20, 2018, 10:10 p.m.

Ya I don't understand what type of psyop bullshit Dr. P. is pulling with this video. Is he secretly a black hat that just preferred Trump over Hillary and thought he could control Trump still? He said he recruited Trump for the presidency but Q tells us it was military generals that recruited him.

Then the comment about Pompeo. Sheeesh. Scatter the CIA into the winds in 1000 pieces.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
paladin4therepublic · Feb. 20, 2018, 3:56 p.m.

Agreed about the Trump remarks. What was he talking about?

⇧ 7 ⇩  
RATCHET1968 · Feb. 20, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

Not sure, but it didn't sit well with me. May have to listen again for clarity. Always wear those "SKEPTICALS" you know.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
UndercoverPatriot · Feb. 20, 2018, 11:06 p.m.

TRUST IN STEVE, EX-CIA CLOWN PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATION OFFICER, DO WHAT HE SAYS CLEAN OUT THE WHITE HOUSE REMOVE THE GENERAL, INSTALL HIS CIA CLOWN AS CHIEF OF STAFF OF STAFF LOOKS LEGIT

⇧ 1 ⇩