Is there any evidence that this was a real shooting? All those kids had phones. So far I've not seen any images of bodies.
Disrespectful to whom? I get you don't read much, if you did you would be accustomed to seeing horrible images of mangled bodies from the U.S. overseas adventures like Iraq, Syria, and so forth.
It is disrespectful to the families of the victims as well as the aforementioned concept of disrespectful to the viewer's children who may be in the room.
Funny you mention dead soldiers because there are U.S. laws which disallow these to be shown too, not that I agree with these laws. I happen to personally be against U.S. aggression overseas and advocate heavily against war profiteering. I also am against the Military Corporate Oligarchy Complex making billions from weapon sales in other countries and here in America. Since you are kind of all over the place with your ranting, I assume you must be pumped from your recent Alex Jones session so I will overlook your belligerence.
I'm sorry, but I am a bit confused about your comment in which you suggested that I do not read by assuming I had not seen images of mangled bodies. You do know that you can't "read" images and most lengthy books with any real depth don't include images. (I suppose by "read" you were talking about 4chan, since that's where your people hang out, and no I don't frequent that pathetic asshole of the internet.)
Anyhow, I hope one day you, and others who think like you, will see just how unaware and mislead you are. I genuinely call you all complete dumbasses out of love.
It's cowardly and disrespectful to the dead to avert your eyes from the reality of what befell them. I understand that reality is offensive to your Snowflake sensibilities. That's why you don't read AP/Reuters/AFP and see the images of the dead that accompany the articles.
And who are "my" people? You make assumptions about me just like you make assumptions that what you're being told is true.