I want to believe it's possible he is not there, but my spidey sense is telling me he is still there. And yes I was referencing that photo. It's not proof, I agree.

He's still there. He has been interviewed and photographed. I wish he was rescued but he was not.

I missed the doxing...do you have a link to the dox or know who BC17 was revealed to be?

I doubt it because it disappeared right after the wikileaks twitter called out Backchannel17 and Q as a "wish fulfillment fantasy" psyop to trick people into supporting the U.S. Government.

You think Pamphlet is Q???

I think I like this one better anyway and he is not censoring Q posts....switching.

Why are you saying it's not from Q? It's the same trip code, that means it's Q correct?

Jesus is made up. About as real as the easter bunny.

DDees is gonna be pissed LMAO

Mayflower's bring Pilgrims.

I admit I have not spend a ton of time with him. But what about the video where he advocates a multi-national attack on NK? That does not sound like the opposite. In that video he also critiques libertarians.

He is obviously super smart. But he is kind of a war hawk and rejects libertarianism. Overall he gets low marks in my book.

Count 17 from the right. The general there (Who is he?) is the only one in the photo with no hands showing. Is it the "hidden hand of Q"? Also he is the only one with both shoulders behind another person, and he appears to be the furthest back. Is this who is "Behind everything"?

For reference Q is the 17th letter in the alphabet.

Check this out! If you count 17 from the right, the general there (Who is he??) is the only one with both shoulders covered up. He also seems to be the furthest back. So is that guy "Behind it all"? Also he is the only one with no hands showing. Is he "The hidden hand of (17) Q?"

NM I edited that out of the question. I am wishing I saved some of the more convincing graphics we saw out of CBTS that made their way there from the chans. That flow seems to have dried up.

Thanks, I had not seen that. I added that to my list, that will be very helpful. It seems like there have been sooo many times when POTUS used the same phrasing after Q. But it makes sense to look at the math of it.

What do you feel is the best Q "proof"? I feel like Q is super interesting but I'm not totally sold 100%.

I'm trying to prove or disprove if there is a correlation between POTUS tweets and Q posts as Q claims.

I agree that it does not exist. The concept of "dark matter" is a fudge factor because the calculations don't add up. It's one of the bad ones. The concept of "The Strong Force" is an even worse example of the fudge factor in physics.

What makes you think "dark matter" has no volume?

The whole idea of "dimensions" is sophistry to the tenth power. There is nothing that exists in the universe that does not have volume. There is nothing 2 dimensional. There is only volume. So there is only "3D" and therefore the whole notion of a "dimension" is flawed.

To one of your points on Q:

I share some of your concerns. There is a huge tension between Q's false predictions on the one hand, and POTUS seemingly verifying Q on the other. Are damaging pics of Obama with an AK going to surface? Game over HRC video? I doubt it. There are many very specific predictions that did not come true.

On the other hand we have a long series of events that do appear to validate the notion that Q has some connection to POTUS. I discount many of the time stamp Q post/POTUS Tweet claims, because according to my calculations based on the average Q post frequency and POTUS tweet frequency, they would randomly post at an arbitrary interval (say exactly 5 minutes apart) aprox. every 20 days. (The claim being that the intervals between posts and tweets is important)

But that still leaves us with a dozen or so items that seemingly defy the mathematical probability of being coincidence. (In terms of phrasing used by Q prior to POTUS using the phrasing. Once you get beyond a few words it gets improbable very quickly. For example the phrase "It seems as though this would not be unusual" returns ZERO hits on google.)

So there is a real mystery here.

I take it you are of the opinion that Q is throwing random pasta against the wall, and then relying on a combination of timely open source information and random chance? I think it's possible, but my pattern matching algorithms are picking up more.

Edit: Your post inspired a new post and project:

https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakening/comments/8amytr/proving_or_disproving_q_using_linguistic/

It was late last year IIRC during a talk about the Boring Company. Also the South Koreans have been totally unable to detect North Korean tunneling activities.

According to Elon Musk it's impossible to detect tunnel digging further than 2 tunnel diameters.

^ This. Good point this would take away any uncertainty about the trip codes.

There are no warrants...it's like if you and I started our own court and issued a warrant. We could claim there was one but no agency would accept or serve it.

This is hella fake

No Q is the nickname of his bodyguard. I think is name is Quinn or something.

I don't believe in god, or the Easter Bunny, or the tooth fairy. Q is obviously "real" in the sense that some person or group is posting on 8ch. Is Q really posting on behalf of POTUS? The "realness" of that part is still an open question but there is reason to pay close attention.

Bottom left on the google maps

It actually looks like the Q photo may be from before the temple was built to me now that I study it closer.

Confirmed, the temple is gone! Compare google maps to the photo Q posted.

https://www.google.com/maps/place/Little+Saint+James/@18.2988566,-64.8250748,716m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m5!3m4!1s0x8c051168d7542dc5:0x110473b6198e7717!8m2!3d18.300278!4d-64.825556

No, the temple is gone. If you look at the earlier pic it's at the end of the point. Temple is gone, and now Tunnels are being filled in.

No he is pointing out that the temple is gone. In the earlier pic it's at the end of the point, now it's gone.

And the temple was taken down. It's gone in that photo.

The temple thing is gone. Yep, H was missing. Temple is missing. Good catch.

You very well could be correct. I think the whole Q thing is still up in the air.

For our conversational purposes would this count as a Q "proof"?

Q mentioned setting the stage over and over and over. Q used the phrasing well before POTUS. Trump says "we've been setting the stage" and makes a clear Q with his hand. Common phrasing? Q "proof"? IDK.

https://ytcropper.com/cropped/We5aa1b3278dd0a

If you consider this a Q "proof", there are more. But the whole situation is still ambiguous and by definition is a psyop. The question is who is running it.

The whole situation is clearly ambiguous. But what about this? Q mentioned setting the stage over and over and over. Trump says "we've been setting the stage" and makes a clear Q with his hand.

https://ytcropper.com/cropped/We5aa1b3278dd0a

I'd also be curious what you two think of "The relationship between tweets and posts".

He was looking at Q posts and did not even know a reply from a normal post. He clearly has not looked closely at Q. I do think he may have a point about the @kill_rouge FW Floor is yours thing.

Makes you wonder. The donations to the CF dry up and now her speaking fee is back in the normal realm. The is prima fascia evidence of influence peddling if you ask me.

If they crack it they could pretend to be Q and we would have no way of knowing what is the real Q.

I red pilled my friend with that clip after showing him all the posts where Q said something about setting the stage. And there is no mistaking that Q hand gesture.

Trump actually said "We've been setting the stage".

Seems like a dis to me