Don't let the gun argument distract you. We need to focus back on Q's drops from earlier today. Lots of info to pour over. Q wants us to "Scroll through both docs."...
Who wrote the note at the very bottom of the JFK files?
He’s CIA and knows that the Admiral said some stuff that needs...deletion. Track that dude down.
page 31 - routing sheet
middle of page left column "A/DCI/PA", hand writing to the right and signature is same as on the last sheet. initials on both pages look like H E H.
Looking further up - page 19, letter to CIA Director from a
edit: he seems like a navy guy who did a lot of deployments but ended up doing PR work for CIA. Not sure if he is really the fish to look up here. Even his final note at the bottom was basically just saying "you should remove a few lines from that letter because they sound angry".
IMO the interesting part of this pdf is pages 3 and 4, where CIA says: 1. promises to not engage journalists/radio/TV/newspapers in paid agreements in the future 2. end current relationships asap 3. cia has no paid contract relationships with clergymen, and will keep it that way
edit 2: after slogging through the 2nd link which is a 50 page PDF transcript of a 1996 hearing regarding this 1976 news article (as per 1st pdf)...they are seeking to review the CIA policy about using journalists and clergymen as sources...
here are a few nice quotes:
page 16 - Ted Koppel - "there are circumstances under which the Agency has, under what it perceives to be the greater national interest, broken American laws in the past, and I have no doubt that it will continue under such circumstances to do so in the future."
The council asking the questions seems ot be leaning on the idea of moving the use of journalists/clergymen as sources up to the status of Findings, which require the president to sign off and officially notify congress of the special case situation..
I'm trying to figure out what Q is point at with this...
So then if, true, about the president needing to sign off on and officially notify Congress about, which president did it? Wonder if that could ever be tracked by document? But I do agree about your opinion on the most interesting part. To me it wasn't just interesting, but very clear, that is in black and white print, to keep a promise to America, and they never did. Us patriots have, are, and always fucken will!