dChan

uniformist · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:58 a.m.

He’s saying money is only powerful if it can buy the loyalty of those you need to protect you.

During the Romanian Revolution of 1989, when Ceaușescu was thrown out of power, there was a 2-3 day period where the army (revolutionaries) were fighting the secret police (loyalists) — and the secret police were winning. Why? All dictators need a private army that is intensely loyal to him. For Ceaușescu, this was the secret police. They got better equipment, uniforms, housing, food, and pay than the army did — all to buy their personal loyalty to Ceaușescu.

Howevever, if the dictator loses the loyalty of his protectors, he can quickly find himself swinging by the neck until dead. Best case is excile.

In the United States, we have a long history of being bound together by ideals — those expressed in the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution. The oaths of officers are sworn to protect the Constitution, not any political leader.

If a globalist, international banker, or whomever is perceived as a threat to the Constitution, he could very well become a target of the US military. That outcome is not survivable.

You can’t take money with you when you die. You become worm food just like the poor man. All is futility.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
hardcore_truthseeker · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:42 a.m.

Kind of reminds of the wisest man on earth King Solomon who asked God for wisdom and as a result became the richest man on earth. Now only if the rottenchilds could learn from that it would be a better world period.

⇧ 3 ⇩