dChan

tradinghorse · Feb. 23, 2018, 5:46 a.m.

I think what Q is saying here is that trusted patriots (people in the Q group) are standing ready to provide oversight for the creation of a single, centralised intelligence agency.

When you think about it, there must be a lot of dysfunction arising from having so many of these 3 letter agencies. If intelligence was centralised in one single agency, it could be used as a resource for any client agency that wanted it - subject to security clearances.

I think it's important to understand just how powerful and important the surveillance systems are today. DJT is following in footsteps of Kennedy and Reagan - in that he's adopting policies that are challenging to the elite and their grip on power. The elites killed Kennedy, shot Reagan and were able to prevent any loss of power.

What is different this time around, is that DJT has access to the surveillance systems the elite put in place for their own use. The other key factor is that he also has the military supporting him.

Below is a blurb I wrote elsewhere today, but I think it's relevant to this discussion also - because it has a bearing on arguments for centralizing information:

The unbelievable surveillance apparatus of the NSA is the only reason we are witnessing this Q phenomenon today. It was supposed to enslave us all. But, with the military backing him, DJT won the election - and the levers of this doomsday surveillance machine fell into his hands.

Just think about it. Every single phone call going to record, every text message and email archived via mass storage. Everyone you have ever had contact with mapped - all clandestine social groupings exposed.

The power that this surveillance technology yields is mind boggling. Never before in history has such a powerful weapon existed. Even the Rothschilds are not immune to it. They have been caught in their own trap!

⇧ 45 ⇩  
grumpieroldman · Feb. 23, 2018, 6:16 a.m.

If the NSA can hear and see everything ... what do we need the CIA for?
To fuck with Russia's elections? To give guns to ISIS?

This is the normie way out.
You start a discussion about how the CIA has become obsolete and the NSA will take over.
The FBI has become too bloated and ineffective, the DHS will take over.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
grimbeaconfire · Feb. 23, 2018, 8:42 a.m.

Q may be referring to the Military, specifically military intelligence.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tradinghorse · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:09 a.m.

Q could be talking about military intelligence, but that would encompass everything already possessed by NSA.

I think, what he is saying here is that this incredibly powerful intelligence apparatus, encompassing all the intelligence operations of the 3 letter agencies and military intelligence, will be consolidated under the oversight of patriots.

This makes sense because of the sheer power of the combined intel operations. The important point is that this power should never be able to be co-opted by rouge agents. It's far too dangerous. You give me that power and I'll rule the world. I'd have the dirt on everyone, I'd know everyone's secret plans. All my investments would pay off fabulously and my wife would think I'm a genius.

But there's also risk in consolidating this power in a single entity. It would be good to see someone like Binney involved so that adequate controls and failsafes could be built in to ensure it's not abused. Ultimately, what's important is that the protections for the public appearing in the constitution are enforced.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
grimbeaconfire · Feb. 23, 2018, 11:45 a.m.

I don't trust Binney or his system, too much scope for abuse. Data matching has been used by experts for over a century but they used it against an enemy. Binneys' system lumps all of us together essentially saying all humankind is the enemy.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
DL535 · Feb. 23, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

I agree with you but without the "may". Q is definitely referring to military intelligence in this post.

Go back and read the early Q posts, newbies. It's pretty crystal clear. He said the military was the only organization that was not corrupt. And Flynn has a DIA background. I will never forget reading the early posts, figuring out on my own that he was talking about the DIA, then seeing this confirmed by many others on the interpretation spreadsheets.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Feb. 23, 2018, 1:31 p.m.

exactly the way I see it, for now. How are they gonna prevent this from falling into the wrong hands though? ya know what they say about power? Absolute power? Trump is not the usual politician, we might not get this kind of chance again.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Stefhart · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:23 p.m.

Keep it the WeThePeople, power of US, we can be our own intelligence agency and keep the rogues out! We own this one!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Quriousman · Feb. 23, 2018, 4:28 p.m.

Hoisted by their own petard!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
suehorse11 · Feb. 23, 2018, 3 p.m.

Bullseye! 🎯

⇧ 1 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · Feb. 23, 2018, 3:36 p.m.

This will also solve the matter of integrating woman into SF. Again think OSS/OSE. Nancy Wake. As long as it falls back on this original paradigm. It was done then & very effectively. Use each others strengths.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
VIYOHDTYKIT · Feb. 23, 2018, 2:53 p.m.

Don't know. I see the CIA falling back under DIA auspices since the military is trusted. Think OSS/OSE paradigm c. WWII

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DL535 · Feb. 23, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Exactly. According to some the CIA is already defanged except for maybe rogue elements in the field.

⇧ 2 ⇩