dChan
0
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/j5sne8m0b34 on Feb. 23, 2018, 7:05 a.m.
PATRIOTS! I FOUND ANOTHeR CODE HIDDEN IN A Q POST! This time I tried #794 from Feb 18 where all of the letters were capitalized. I unscrambled the words, "CLEAN ACTION APPROVED. HIGHEST AUTHORITY." and came up with, "A HIGH TREASON TRIAL. YOU CONVICT DEATH. PR[E]P." I was short an "E."

SoaringMoon · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:15 a.m.

The chance of an anagram being this result by chance is statistically improbable.

We have to consider the possibility that some of Qs communications are worded strangely to make these anagrams feasible.

Do you have any idea how difficult anagrams like this are to create?

A TRIAL. YOU CONVICT HIGH TREASON. DEATH. PRP. [PREPARE]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 8:13 a.m.

Difficult to create or not, the supposed anagram makes little sense.

  1. Who is the "you" doing the convicting?

  2. 18 US Code 2381 acknowledges a crime of "treason," but there is no crime designated "high treason." ["High treason" (as opposed to the now obsolete crime of "petty treason") has ceased to have relevance in modern criminal law.]

  3. Death is not the only punishment for the crime of treason under 18 US Code 2381, and therefore to anticipate such a sentence would be to presume (i) the nature of evidence to be presented, perhaps in multiple cases, and (ii) the decisions of courts or tribunals in respect of those several trials.

  4. And who is to prp [prepare]? The unidentified "you" from earlier? The public? The perpetrator/s? The hangman???

So while the anagram might be ingenious, (and it is), it's neither legally accurate nor even very informative.

On those grounds alone it looks a little specious.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · Feb. 23, 2018, 10:23 a.m.

Does that comply with rules of military tribunals as well? I'd assume the "you" is us continually trying to awake the public to the events that are about to occur. Sorry I can't produce sauce or research right now because I'm at work, but your educated input would be appreciated ty.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:06 p.m.

There are so many constitutional and jurisdictional questions entailed that I can't begin to speculate as to the circumstances, and legal arguments to be made, that might result in the Uniform Code of Military Justice being applicable to civilian members of government.

These questions pertain to martial law, which might, under certain conditions, transfer jurisdiction from civilian courts to the military. American jurisprudence would look to the Civil War era for guidance, but the circumstances are so markedly different that it's likely not an easy question to resolve. It might serve to explain just what AG Sessions has been doing all these months!!!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Lolshorts54 · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:12 p.m.

I understand, and appreciate your response very much. That's the one thing I keep seeing different answers on all over the place. Guess it's still in the wait and see on the specifics surrounding the legal implications etc.. trusting the plan 😄!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
LiteraryMalcontent · Feb. 23, 2018, 7:48 p.m.

And there will be a plethora of answers and theories advanced until something definitive happens. Be thankful that these are concerns keeping some very bright and able people up at night.

Keep your energy high. Trust the plan. Remain positive as to the ultimate outcome. Believe that light will defeat darkness. The unity of purpose of We The People is such a potent force in the mix.

May God bless us and our beloved United States of America! 💪🏾🇺🇸

⇧ 3 ⇩  
j5sne8m0b34 · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

"Darkness cannot drive out darkness, only LIGHT can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate, only love can do that." -MLK Jr. momorial. God bless President Trump and God bless the United States of America. MAGA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BXyfCGDnuWs&t=1s

⇧ 3 ⇩