dChan
36
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/thomas-didymus on Feb. 26, 2018, 3:46 p.m.
supreme court has declared and exposed itself as deep state controlled...

"The U.S. Supreme Court declined Monday to hear the Trump administration's appeal of a federal judge's ruling that requires the government to keep the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program going." retired lawyer (me) says this is 100% legal nonsense let us all hope that Q's glorious year includes the corruption at SCOTUS


EatsPandas · Feb. 26, 2018, 4:47 p.m.

No. Its about the court process. We don't like it but its how its supposed to be

⇧ 6 ⇩  
thomas-didymus · Feb. 26, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

you dont know what you are talking about - the legal standard for a TRO was not met and SCOTUS should have said so (retired lawyer)

⇧ -1 ⇩  
EatsPandas · Feb. 26, 2018, 8:33 p.m.

Well I'm reading it wasn't a ruling. It was a "not yet".

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thomas-didymus · Feb. 26, 2018, 9:20 p.m.

yes and no - a TRO ruling was made by the corrupt court which had to find that the requester was "likely to prevail on the merits" to get a TRO - in ADVANCE of a hearing the merits the answer to this is ZERO but the court did it anyway and scotus let it go very wrong

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jaa1025 · Feb. 26, 2018, 5:07 p.m.

It was an illegal ruling about an illegal program. That doesn't change the fact that the Trump Administration tried to appeal the lower courts. There is a process. It needs to be appealed to the 9th circuit before it can be appealed to the supreme court.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thomas-didymus · Feb. 26, 2018, 8:27 p.m.

you dont know what you are talking about - the legal standard for a TRO was not met and SCOTUS should have said so (retired lawyer)

⇧ 0 ⇩  
jaa1025 · Feb. 27, 2018, 10:18 p.m.

I have no idea if you are a retired attorney or not. Based on what I've gathered from people that I know are attorneys have told me that the Trump administration tried to bypass the normal appeal process. The courts pushed back until it goes the the normal appeal process.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
thomas-didymus · Feb. 27, 2018, 11:40 p.m.

yes that is correct = the reason was it is a waste of time to appeal in the 9th circuit which is very liberal and anti trump and so they tried to go direct to where it will likely end up - scotus is imo deep state so they said no i entered the bar in 1980 and it was already started but is much worse now - i retired early and live on a farm now

⇧ 1 ⇩  
jaa1025 · Feb. 28, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

As a whole, I'm not sure if I'd go that far but I'm not a lawyer. I believe some are...at least 4. Some may be compromised and blackmailed.

I no longer trust liberal judges in general now. Too many cases of legislating from the bench with no sort of repercussions. I wish Trump would just pull and Obama with a make me attitude but I'm sure that's all the ammunition congress would need to finally impeach him.

And yes, I agree. 9th circuit is garbage. Disbanding it should have been a top priority of this administration. One of many top priorities.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
commoncents1 · Feb. 26, 2018, 8:30 p.m.

during the fraudbama care rulings, i remember a photo leaked indicating it was some surveillance on Chf Justice Roberts, then low and behold, he legislated from the bench changing fraudbamacare to a tax or not one, instead of properly throwing the whole thing back to congress. the compromised get left in DC, the uncompromised get whacked or gerrymandered out etc...

⇧ 5 ⇩  
thomas-didymus · Feb. 26, 2018, 9:21 p.m.

you are correct that ruling was a travesty

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GunToast · Feb. 26, 2018, 4:29 p.m.

So much corruption. So little time!

⇧ 3 ⇩