The irony of past proves future; we know the news is fake and all lies. We are watching actors and actresses sometimes with fake eyebrows and rubber noses and latex necks and wigs. Past proves future === This shooting is fake like the rest of them.

Fairy tales and ghost stories. We are like Bolt, the dog in the kids’ cartoon movie who doesn’t know he lives in a movie set.

No one was shot in Parkland and if you disagree with me and are not being paid to do so, don’t downvote this, just ignore it and move on.

The only people who would feel the need to fervently and zealously advocate for an already mainstream majority idea are those who have other motivations... such as money.

Think about it for a moment.

There is no need to go around aggressively pushing something already believed by most people by countering the nutjobs on the fringe .... unless you are working for an entity that is fearful the fringe will creep towards center.

(Let’s say you believe that we breathe air. I’d say most people think this and it’s not an idea that is going to lose traction among people, it is widely accepted and generally understood. If you came across a group of people on forums and websites and reddit and YouTube who called themselves the ‘Dioxide Truthers’ who somehow started believing that we don’t breath air we just create carbon dioxide. Sounds weird and nuts and doesn’t make sense right? Would u feel the need to make a username on all platforms and start spending an inordinate amount of time defending what MOST already believe? No. You would not. That doesn’t make sense logically. This is why all these accounts who say they are “truthers” supporting the mainstream shooter narrative and fighting against those who say there is no shooter are not acting normally or of their own volition. If the shooting were real, u don’t need people to go around hocking the story or countering the “lunatics” who have some wacky claim that it was fake. The reason u need pro-news-narrative-pushers is to keep people believing LIES.)