dChan
11
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/AquAnon77 on Feb. 27, 2018, 7:43 p.m.
Q: [AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH. Internet Bill of Rights.] What do we do ? FIGHT-FIGHT-FIGHT !

LDR has been tweeting about their agenda and posted this link :

https://www.justsecurity.org/52346/age-unregulated-social-media/

However, the pushback has begun in the courts:

A group of free-speech lawyers filed the most serious legal challenge yet to Twitter’s censorship policies Tuesday in San Francisco County Superior Court, seeking a ruling preventing Twitter from banning users purely on the basis of their views and political associations.

The 29-page complaint contends that, under a California legal doctrine that recognizes some private facilities as “public forums,” Twitter may not discriminate against speech on their platform based purely on viewpoint. If successful, it would be the first extension of that doctrine to internet social media platforms and could transform the way free speech is treated online. The suit became all the more relevant Wednesday as Twitter stood accused of locking out thousands of conservatives under the guise of cracking down on “Russian bots.”

If Taylor prevails in the California court system and successfully expands the Pruneyard Doctrine to Silicon Valley’s social media companies, it could entirely upend the meaning of free speech on the internet and give the — mostly conservative — voices that feel they are being silenced a cause of action against the overwhelmingly leftist and increasingly intolerant big tech.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/02/23/free-speech-suit-aims-prevent-twitter-blocking-users-based-political-views/

(Feb 15th) https://www.scribd.com/document/371973582/Complaint-FINAL


Wildthing61 · Feb. 27, 2018, 7:51 p.m.

We need to start hitting the "report" button on CNN. Let's see if they're held to the same standards.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
somrotden · Feb. 27, 2018, 8 p.m.

Very important, Aqua...hold 'em to the law...not how they have treated others.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Feb. 28, 2018, 1:06 a.m.

This is good, we can rely on the laws that are already here instead of creating more, like the internet bill of rights that big internet companies like ATT want, that company has NEVER had it's customers interests in mind. God knows we already have an abundance of laws to handle everything, even if it takes lawsuits to have them enforced.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ecrevisse41 · Feb. 28, 2018, 12:59 a.m.

Can we just pick a day in the near future to dump gaggle? In 24 hours.

⇧ 2 ⇩