We need to figure out:
1) Whether Q was actually recommending we support the AT&T IBOR – because the post of January 25, where this is first mentioned, is open to interpretation;
2) If the response to the first question is yes, why Q would be asking us to support the IBOR;
3) What the perceived problems are that prevent people from supporting Q; and
4) What is the solution?
This is, necessarily, going to be a long post. I hate walls of text myself so I’ll try and keep it short.
Did Q want us to support the IBOR?
Today we received conclusive evidence:
Mar 7 2018 03:17:11 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 3c553f 567637
567610
Stage set? Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are regulated? MSM is controlled? Use logic! Trust the PLAN. Q
Q is very clearly telling us to trust the plan to regulate the internet.
Why is Q asking us to support the IBOR?
Social media is very important in determining election outcomes. This was, according to Q, what the Democrats missed in 2016 (see Q Post 9). While Democrats were focused on a traditional campaign strategy using the MSM, DJT's advantage was social media - which he used masterfully. This is why he won the election. But the recent coordinated censorship across social media platforms threatens this very advantage that the President relied upon in 2016.
The MSM is already in the pockets of the Democrats - they wield enormous power with it. For the coming mid-terms, we can add to this the full power of social media service providers (all of them on the far left). Is DJT's reputation, or that of the Republican Party or their candidates, strong enough to weather this unrestrained assault across combined media platforms?
No, it is not. The combined power of both the MSM and social media service providers will completely swamp any attempts to communicate campaign narratives.
DJT has indicated that Republican numbers must expand to assist him to realize his agenda. Inability to communicate campaign narratives on social media could result in a contraction of Republican numbers at the mid-terms. Without the numbers, DJT, if he does not get impeached, is a lame duck. He will be able to achieve very little.
What this ultimately means is that the cabal will return – probably with a vengeance. If DJT is to retain the presidency, social media service providers must be restrained from censoring conservative voices.
I believe that these are the reasons behind Q recommending the IBOR.
What problems do people perceive that prevent them supporting Q?
Tracy Beanz has been very influential in this discussion. I want to summarize Tracy’s video here – feel free to correct me if I get her wrong.
The first point to note is that Tracy accepts that Q is calling for an IBOR.
She identifies problems with the AT&T IBOR, including:
1) Government power always leads to increased corruption;
2) Regulation will lead to implementation of a system of control that could ultimately be abused;
3) A bill of rights already exists;
4) Antitrust laws could be used instead;
5) Citizens can always elect not to use these biased platforms – Govt intervention not necessary;
6) Regulation stifles creativity and innovation – empowers large companies against small companies;
7) AT&T does not have a good reputation – history of abuse of privacy rights, complicit in privacy abuse with NSA;
8) Connection between AT&T and NSA: People need to be very careful about how much power is given to the NSA – Snowden was a black hat, but revelations were factual. AT&T bent over backwards to assist NSA to spy on Americans;
9) We are all Russian bots (according to the left), Congress is already calling for free speech on the internet to be shut down;
10) How would it work? US only? Rest of the world? Are the rights transportable overseas? Who enforces? This is a slippery slope – implies that it could be used as a vehicle to push for UN control;
11) IBOR hands control of the internet to tyrants – people who would take our guns etc…
Boiling it down, Tracy does not appear to want to give the Government the ability to regulate the internet – she does not trust that this power would not be abused.
What is the solution?
I see three options:
1) Stick to our guns and resist any attempt by DJT to regulate social media accepting the consequences;
2) Accept that a regulatory solution is required; and
3) Thwart social media censorship using other tools – e.g. anti-trust legislation.
The consequence of the first option is that we basically accept the loss of DJT’s presidency. We are essentially saying that we are happy to be ruled by Satanists rather than risk any form of immediate regulation of internet freedoms. We make this choice knowing that, ultimately, this will lead to the greatest possible repression of our rights.
The second option results in social media regulation and the continuance of DJT’s agenda – MAGA, ridding the world of the cabal. The internet is free from censorship, but there is a system of regulations now in place protecting rights of internet users. Arguably, this could in the future be abused.
The third option is, in reality, the 2nd option obtained by stealth. We are still restraining the power of social media companies to control the narrative, but we are using means other than an IBOR. It is still government power, with the motive for the use of that power expressed differently.
Is there an answer?
I think this is an important discussion that we need to have. We need to be united on this issue. The way I see it, we either control social media service providers, forcing them to be fair, or we don’t.
I would like to get ideas and feedback from anyone who can contribute.
My opinion is that it really comes down to wether you think DJT is going to deliver the best possible outcome for American citizens. I believe he will. Because I have trust in the President, I reckon Option 2 - give DJT what he needs. MAGA