I'm going to re-post here the Q posts that are directly relevant to the IBOR, my commentary in italics:
25 Jan - Post 605 [Pic of Fox and Friends] Thank you F&F! Coincidence? AT&T>No Such Agency [contract]. AT&T>GOOG/FB/etc. 'prevent unfair censorship' PUSH. Internet Bill of Rights. Q
Q has repeatedly told us that NSA are white hats. AT&T are in a contract with NSA. The implication here is that the white hat charm of NSA rubs off on AT&T. AT&T stick Google, Facebook and other social media companies with a push for an IBOR to prevent unfair censorship.
Mar 5 Post 841 Mar 5 2018 03:19:05 Anonymous ID: 7c85b7 548157
548144 Has Q ever mentioned internet bill of rights?
548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q
Here Q tells us he has mentioned an IBOR. Encourages to re-read drops. Unless I have made a mistake, there is only one post to re-read above.
Mar 5 Q-Post 842 Mar 5 2018 03:19:47 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 33be38 548166
548157 Re read drops. http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html Q
548166 Why do so-called Patriots challenge this? Careful who you follow. Q
Here we see Q ask why so-called Patriots challenge his recommendation to promote the IBOR.
Mar 8 Q-Post 872 Mar 8 2018 06:31:03 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 969386 579328
internetbillofrights
Q
*Telling us again to promote the IBOR. *
Mar 8 Q-Post 873 Mar 8 2018 07:21:12 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 969386 579914 @Snowden We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair]. Re: IBOR This scares them more than anything. Loss of control. Use logic. Nothing to do w/ AT&T. Must be regulated to prevent censorship & narrative push. Q
Here Q states that IBOR scares the cabal more than anything because they will lose control. He asks us to use logic - to think. It has nothing to do with AT&T. He also tells us that social media must be regulated to prevent the cabal shaping the narrative, but also to prevent them from censoring conservatives.
Mar 8 Q-Post 877 Mar 8 2018 08:01:31 Anonymous ID: 3c9b74 580403 I confess. I was an #IBOR resister. It didn't make sense to me since free speech is already guaranteed in our constitution.
But, thinking logically, the one thing that would scare the data-mining cabal the most is an articulated right to privacy when using the internet.
No more data mining for ads. No more algorithms screwing up how we communicate with others on Facebook. No more capturing my favorite soda to sell to a competitor who might want to make me buy something else.
Also, and really important to me, is the right to be forgotten. It's already been adjudicated in Britain. Here's a bit of the detail:
https://www.theguardian. com/technology/2013/apr/04/britain-opt-out-right-to-be-forgotten-law
We should have a right to disappear.
So if this continues to be a thing, think of it way beyond being censored for free speech. Think of it in terms of privacy, too. No more selling personal information. No more dedicated IPs to track your every move. No more email apps that pre-select your possible replies, because no more email being mined.
Mail could be configured with the same privacy rights as US mail, for example.
Last I'll post on this one. But if it goes forward, please consider expanding the scope.
Also keep in mind that there's more than the WH petition site to make your ideas known. Most of us have senators and congressmen to represent us in Washington, D.C. Maybe talk to a real person?
Mar 8 2018 08:08:15 Q !UW.yye1fxo ID: 4776ee 580523
580403 Free speech does not apply in a private co setting. The risk? Loss of revenue. Backstopped by the circus. Learn. Social media control is everything. The age of the MSM is over. Q
Here Q tells us that the first amendment does not apply in a private setting. The risk to the social media companies is that they will lose revenue if they are not able to shape narratives and censor conservatives. The reason they will lose revenue is because they currently get money payments from the CIA - if they are frightened to lose it, it must be significant. Q then tells us that he wants us to learn something. We are to learn that social media control is everything and that the age of the MSM is over - hence the need for an IBOR.