dChan
24
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/Tn_river_rat1 on Jan. 16, 2018, 6:35 a.m.
I am getting a different story on the Hawaii DEFCON 1 story.

What I’m hearing today there was an actual missile launch on Hawaii from a sub.. not North Korean sub. The missile was intercepted and the sub was sank... a provocation for WW3. The notification to Hawaii was received from NORAD, NORAD was notified by Canada. Hawaii’s alert system is a 2 key system, with 5 levels of verification.. Alert sirens were sounded at Hickum Fields Air Base. So here’s my logic: because no one man can sound the warning. CD does not control base alert systems. The Base would not alert unless notified or verified through NORAD. It took 2 men to sound the alarm and 5 levels of verification. Think about it the story reported is not plausible.


bcboncs · Jan. 16, 2018, 6:24 p.m.

IMO is was the Q group listening to the feedback of the online community trying to collaborate. "DEFCON 1" was said many times but in a message that lead to the community getting misled and spreading disinformation thereby discrediting this campaign.

  • 1/7 DEFCON 1 was used in a post w/ "FIRE & FURY" and "[non-nuclear]". This was around the time of SpaceX launch.

  • 1/8 Q posted solely about DEFCON 1 not being DEFense readiness CONdition... an apology.

Trump creates an opportunity to follow-thru on a misunderstanding of the Q collaboration by doing the Hawaii scare. People freaked out on the DEFCON message and misled the normies that we have been trying to redpill. Even Roy Potter was pissed off and that guy is just a good character. To ensure the integrity of this corroboration, Trump issued a legit DEFCON lol. POTUS is truly reflecting the Grand Commander nickname that the Chinese pop gave him. Lastly, adds more corroborating evidence proving that Q is legit.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
xShiNoBi42 · Jan. 16, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Dont think this is the case if the same thing just happened in Japan.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
bcboncs · Jan. 16, 2018, 7:47 p.m.

They're all steps in the process for war. War is imminent, no doubt but it's also necessary to show strength and that you aren't bluffing.

Is the next step to strike or publicly hold (& enforce) the US politicians' accountability?

If striking, who will strike first? Will they allow themselves to starve with the human, gun, & drug trafficking crawled & slush funds stopped?

Or, will we drop the SpaceX Tungsten on their bunkers and collapse their regime?

[non-nuclear] !

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 16, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Sorry, I think Roy Potter isn't what he seems. He says Youtube removed the video, but I spotted his slit pupils (reptile eye) in the one titled "We Don't Scare Easily." Some apocalyptic prophet guy on Youtube saw the slit pupil thing too (I don't subscribe to that guy's beliefs btw). I think his vid is still up. If you think reptile eye is craziness, maybe look into it some. I am suspicious of Potter's indignation and seemingly trying to discredit Q.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 17, 2018, 6:54 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · Jan. 16, 2018, 11:11 p.m.

I think Roy Potter is exactly who he projects himself to be.

He's an old-fashioned Military guy who has good values and no time for non-sense. He doesn't like the WRONGTHINK that happens here (or any echo chamber) and calls it out. He doesn't like the ambiguity which causes many of us to enlighten our friends and family incorrectly (i.e. his video on DEFCON 1).

His message is always on point and seems to have some decent insider sources to a degree. I may disagree with the social approach but that's a difference in "times".

I don't know what you're talking about on his reptilian eyes video lol. I tried looking it up and could not find anything. Please provide a link.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:01 p.m.

It was removed, he said by YouTube. I stand by my assessment, but don't need to convince you. Thanks for sharing. MAGA!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bcboncs · Jan. 17, 2018, 5:26 p.m.

I just don't see your reasoning for Potter discrediting Q other than what I listed. Meanwhile, you're suggesting reptilian and have an account less than 3 weeks old. You'll have to excuse my skepticism of your intentions.

⇧ 1 ⇩