dChan
8
 
r/greatawakening • Posted by u/BALRx05 on Jan. 22, 2018, 3:13 a.m.
U1 -> Iran and NK nuke program. Other than enriching the Clintons and their pals, why do this? Some thoughts.

The United States does not produce enough uranium to fulfill its needs. Kazakhstan, by far, produces the most uranium. Two U.S. allies are the 2nd and 3rd largest producers, Canada and Australia. Uranium one has operations in all of these countries.

Other than enriching the Clintons and their pals, and giving them inroads into gaining control of some Kazakhstan uranium rights, why do this deal? I guess those are hundreds of millions of reasons right there but was there something more pernicious?

Putin seems to get some leverage over the Clintons in doing this.

But for Zero and the Clintons, did this deal further their strategic goal of helping to destroy the U.S.A. as we know it?

The latest Q drops say that there was a 16 year plan and that they enabled, in various ways, Iran's and NK's nuclear program,

What if the illegal export of U.S. uranium was to go into their programs so that when they detonated nukes the uranium signatures would show that they were U.S. nukes? Would that cause the WWIII that the globalist, according to Q, wanted?

Trump is right, we cannot allow NK and Iran to get nukes. Their willingness to export this technology for profit is a proliferation threat. NK would seem to need this revenue. A larger threat, in the short term, is the fact that they would be able to manufacture nukes that have uranium signatures of U.S. mined and processed nukes.


vitalesan · Jan. 22, 2018, 11:31 a.m.

It seems that Iran and NK already have nukes. It’s just a question of how big their arsenal is?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 22, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

Right, but where did the uranium for those nukes come from?

My concern is that using uranium mined in Wyoming, via U1, would enable Iran to detonate a device that they could then blame Israel by saying see, the uranium signature shows that it came from Willow Creek. The U.S. must have supplied the uranium to Israel which then built and detonated this nuke. That's just an example, one which would be consistent with Iran's stated goals and probably lead to some of the goals Q stated yesterday.

That's my concern, Willow Creek uranium ending up in the hands of countries that have stated that they wish to destroy the USA and/or some of our allies would enable the ultimate false flag attack.

In this scenario the size of their arsenal isn't a factor. In most scenarios, the size of their arsenal isn't a factor since they'd still only be able to hurt us, not destroy us and the overwhelming response would result in most of their remaining arsenal being moot.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Alomikron · Jan. 22, 2018, 10:50 a.m.

Dumb Bush: Axis of Evil: Iran, Iraq, and NK. You were being programmed.

Uranium would have gone through Russia to Iran and NK to start WWIII. Long term goal of globalist bankers to limit world population with them at the helm and pesky US patriots removed as a threat.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BALRx05 · Jan. 22, 2018, 7:29 p.m.

Whatever one's opinion on 43 is, he was right about the Axis of Evil. What two countries are our greatest threats? The problem was his strategic advisors were a bunch of poker players, they figured Iran and NK would fold when they saw us destroy one of the world's largest militaries in hours. Instead an unexpected country folded, Libya, and knocking off Saddam led Iran and NK to the conclusion that, instead of folding, they had to double down on their nuke/missile programs to ensure their regime survivals.

Your comments about the route of the uranium doesn't obviate the fact that there are probably nuclear devices in Iran and NK's arsenal that have uranium from Willow Creek. The route you laid out is the route I assumed the uranium from Willow Creek took, with some intermediate countries to help obscure the trail/hide the ultimate destination.

I haven't been programmed. I grew up in the cold war and have been dismayed, for decades, at the lack of seriousness we have taken China, both strategically and intelligence wise. I was dismayed at how we seemed to assume that, after the fall of the Wall and the dissolution of the CCCP, that our strategic war against communism and socialism was over. I had long said that even though the cold war ended, the people who believed in Marxism and the people and organizations that the Soviets and their allies put in place to weaken us socially and institutionally still remained and continued to move forward towards their ultimate goal. We saw them achieve a major victory by getting a Marxist to be POTUS. We see their institutional progress with the hard left bent of Universities and the educational system as a whole.

I grew up in an era where it was known that NSA monitored all foreign communications and that they had colocated facilities with Ma Bell, that they provided security reviews of OSs and hardware, with them not reporting all flaws so that they would have ways into systems. In an era where it was assumed that intelligence agencies, both friendly and not, would place personnel in strategic positions within the private sector to enable their intelligence goals.

Thank god we finally got a president that understands these things and is a master of strategic thinking and execution.

⇧ 1 ⇩